非因非果加强!!
我选之前就在E和C之间犹豫,一开始没有选E是因为觉得do more distance objects,就觉得加了一个Do去连接more很奇怪
先考虑goal是什么即可解题
有没有讲解,解答下
两种情况
分母分母。
忘记25了
就怕别人说“众所周知”,我问遍周围的人,没人知道
哈哈~好吧
as we all know
我也才知道
D:each employee... prohibit them..
1. and表示并列,但这里不是并列关系
2. have dated 时态不对
3. ,。。。。
While several studies have found a significant correspondence between the density dependence model and actual patterns of foundings, other studies have found patterns not consistent with the model. A possible explanation for this inconsistency。。。。。。。Even within national contexts, studies have found more support for:文中提到有问题的不是model本身,而是第二段开头提到的studies+文章的第二段确实对这个模型提出了质疑,但是这个质疑的目的是作者的让步,为的是提出可能的解释。
Locate to " once it was underway rather than to have initiated it".
I didn't really understand the meaning of this phrase, but it means exactly what D talks about.
A怎么不行 啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊
这个定语部分的核心词为consumers(having the power是现在分词短语,做consumers的定语)。在逻辑上,一个简单的主题应该是一件事,即,消费者有改变的权力,而不是消费者本身(一定是消费者做了什么事为主题,没有消费者的主题)。因此,这个介词短语应改为一个同位语从句
choice (e) inadvertently states that "the rate of people" is consuming fatty foods. that doesn't make any sense.
everyone laughed at me accidentally walking into the girls' bathroom --> WRONG. sorry. this sentence would actually mean that everyone laughed at me as they were walking into the girls' bathroom.
everyone laughed at my accidentally walking into the girls' bathroom --> CORRECT
大哥们读问题啊,这是演绎推理。哪里来的加强,果因推理啊
我明白C 的意思,但是我就是觉得很牵强啊,所以我选了D ,有人能解释一下为什么D 无关吗?没迁徙记录这不就说明了很可能没狮子吗?以及,没有同行的目击者怎么就削弱了,他这是好几个目击者于不同的时间点目击到的,有没有人同行有什么要紧的?这个削弱也未免太不明显了吧
我也是觉得c是质疑了前提,才没选的,既然前提已经是事实了,为什么要质疑呢,不懂
对啊,C为什么不是质疑前提。。
题干中说的是in the past few years, people 都claim 看到狮子,说明狮子早就在这个地区几年了。但D 说的是in the past year狮子没有迁移过来,完全有可能——自然不能削弱选项。C的话,我的理解是三人成虎,一个人说这是狮子,其他人都这样说。OG 上的说法说,如果两个人一起的话,很可能误认为狮子后,同行者会纠正他。
我觉得不是质疑前提吧,C质疑的 从premise 到conclusion 这一个reasoning 的过程。
P1: several people claim to see a lion
P2: people have no reason to cheat
C: local wildlife managers should begin to address the lion's presence
GAP: Even people have no reason, is there any possible that people have mistakenly believe they have seen a lion when in fact they saw sth else
为什么不能是类比题?任你说单方面说的天花乱坠,没有rt和cr比较也不成立,所以我们首先筛选出有比较的选项,所以直接选择e,这个思路对吗?@毕老师
我也觉得是类比
看到and, parallelism , 名词短语和句子不能平行。