扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-SC-27
When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.
When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.
Including a call for female enfranchisement, a draft of the Declaration of Sentiments was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848 that Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote.
When the Declaration of Sentiments drafted by Elizabeth Cady Stanton was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Convention in 1848, a call for female enfranchisement had been included in it.
A call for female enfranchisement, included in Elizabeth Cady Stanton's draft of the Declaration of Sentiments in 1848, that was adopted by the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention.
When Elizabeth Cady Stanton drafted the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, she included in it a call for female enfranchisement.
错选了c。 过去完成式。原句想说 a call was included when drafting. c变成了，a call had been included when adopted. 意思变了。
C, when the Declaration was adopted, a call had been included.A do B when C do D,when表示两个动作同时发生。这里had been表示在adopted之前included，时间逻辑互相冲突。
c 选项后半句的动词时态为 HAD+ED过去完成时， 和前面 when句子中的 过去时，冲突。
还是从句意去理解，C强调的是这件事，而明显句意是强调Elizabeth Cady Stanton这个人做的这件事，所以选E。抓重点放细节
A 人是一个call, 不合逻辑
B including a call的动作发出者是a draft, 不合逻辑
C when表同时发生，had been included不合逻辑
D 没有谓语动词
C 过去完成时不对，原文想表达的就是E这个人在起草宣言的时候，把女性选举权加了进去
C用过去完成时有点wordy，draft和include肯定是发生在adopt之前的，没有必要再用过去完成时强调发生的顺序性
先看了一遍选项，感觉是考句意理解。
A. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement. 明显错，排除A；
B. that Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote 修饰前面的the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention，明显错误，排除B；
C. When the xxxx was adopted xxxxx in 1848, a call had been included in it. 根据A的意思猜测，时间顺序不对，a call 应该是 draft 的时候就写进去的，不是修改的时候；排除；
D.句子结构混乱，排除；
E.完美表达了句意，correct！
A、谁drafting是个谜，句子成分残缺
B、that修饰谁是个谜
C、when前后时态不一致，用过完非常尴尬，更改句意
D、“，that”修饰有误，句子成分残缺
竟然选了B，Elizabeth起草的是declaration。C改变了意思，
A选项是倒装！！！你们都理解错了included in it是过去分词，a call才是主语！人名是author的同位语！a call不能drafting，这才是split
1.when X, Y…. 注意:只有当A发生时，B才发生。A不发生时，B也不发生。
本题的当她起草某份宣言时，她在宣言里纳入了一个关于女性的呼吁，纳入呼吁发生的时间确实只限制在起草宣言时，when的用法ok
2.if you write "when X, Y"... Y has to be IN THE SAME TIMEFRAME as X.
the "had ___ed" tense implies a DIFFERENT (earlier) timeframe, so, it's nonsense in that context.
B：a draft was adopted❌，that也没有就近修饰，不太好
Takeaway：1.长划线容易出现修饰成分移动，导致修饰成分不符合就近原则。2.过去完成时的复核
1) 修饰成分应该尽量靠近修饰对象
2) 逗号+ -ed形容词的结构中, -ed形容词从语法上修饰的是逗号前最后一个名词
3) 分词短语在句首起状语作用,逻辑主语等于句子主语
c选项，最后的a call for female enfranchisement had been included in it. 这个 IT 产生歧义， 指的是Declaration of Sentiments 还是指Convention，语义比较模糊。 when the Declaration was adopted, a call had been included.A do B when C do D,when表示两个动作同时发生。这里had been表示在adopted之前included，时间逻辑互相冲突
c选项，最后的a call for female enfranchisement had been included in it. 这个 IT 产生歧义， 指的是Declaration of Sentiments 还是指Convention，语义相对 E 比较模糊。
draft起草
BCS是draft the Declaration 所以B选项❌
A, included in it was a call是个倒装句，伴随状语在句首的，主句主语同时也为伴随状语的逻辑主语应该紧接着出现，中间不能有其他的句子成分；再说call也不能做drafting的逻辑主语
B, 逻辑是：Elizabeth drafted the Declaration of Sentiments, the Declaration of Sentiments was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention,B句表述的是Elizabeth wrote Convention，错误
C, when the Declaration was adopted, a call had been included.A do B when C do D,when表示两个动作同时发生。这里had been表示在adopted之前included，时间逻辑互相冲突。
D, 构句错误。
A 人是一个call，错！
B 一个草稿被采纳，A的意思是一份声明被采纳，这份声明被起草的时候如何如何，B错
C 当声明被采纳的时候，一个号召被包含在这个声明里
D 没有谓语动词，无法构成一个句子，错！
E当人在起草一份声明的时候，她把一个号召加了了这份声明里。
E更优。
include可以有主动有被动，人包含某物在……里是可以的
C是when引导的状语从句修饰，导致的语义错误。
当declaration被采用的时候，一个有关女性解放的呼吁被包括了进去。when做状语，修饰的是included的动词。这句话没什么逻辑关系。如果是当declaration被采用的时候，一个有关女性解放的呼吁被引起，是合乎逻辑意思的。
E当ECS起草declaration（被在1848采用的宣言）的时候，她把女性解放的呼吁加了进去。逻辑更通畅。
关于被动语态：虽然ETS不区分主被动的优劣，但是被动的一个问题是，如果没有明确动作发出这（比如by，from等介词没有出现），就很容易导致主语不清的情况出现。比如C选项的has been included，可以by ECS，也可以by president，还可以by Barack Obama..等等。
C被动式不带逻辑主语，没有说这个call是被谁放进去的，语意上没有E好。
E句意是“当EC起草了XX时，它将一个call包含在了里面——E与C相比，主动优于被动
sth is included in xx
sb include sth in xx