When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.
When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.
Including a call for female enfranchisement, a draft of the Declaration of Sentiments was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848 that Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote.
When the Declaration of Sentiments drafted by Elizabeth Cady Stanton was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Convention in 1848, a call for female enfranchisement had been included in it.
A call for female enfranchisement, included in Elizabeth Cady Stanton's draft of the Declaration of Sentiments in 1848, that was adopted by the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention.
When Elizabeth Cady Stanton drafted the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, she included in it a call for female enfranchisement.
另外choice c, 由于采取了被动语态导致include的发出者不明确。但是结合前后文的意思,include的发出者明确得指向了ECS
choice b,句首的including, 看成是伴随状语,动作的发出者是主句的主语a draft,逻辑上草稿不会主动发出‘包括’的动作
choice c, when引导的时间状语从句和主句的timeframe是一致的。但是从逻辑顺序来说,was adopted发生在后,had been included发生在前。
choice e, correct, draft和include的发出者都是ECS,且两个动作在一个timeframe中
凡是看到这种when……,sb do sth的都要多加注意,when在这里对主句发生的时间进行了限制,只有当某件事在发生时,某人才发生这个动作或处于某种状态。GMAT里,通常这种限制都是错误的
本题的当她起草某份宣言时,她在宣言里纳入了一个关于女性的呼吁,纳入呼吁发生的时间确实只限制在起草宣言时,when的用法ok
A 人是一个call,错!
B 一个草稿被采纳,A的意思是一份声明被采纳,这份声明被起草的时候如何如何,B错
C 当声明被采纳的时候,一个号召被包含在这个声明里
D 没有谓语动词,无法构成一个句子,错!
E当人在起草一份声明的时候,她把一个号召加了了这份声明里。
E更优。
include可以有主动有被动,人包含某物在……里是可以的
如:You should include some examples in your essay. 你应该在论文里举些例子。
我擦,太TM搞了。1‘40’‘,这么多坑要趟,怎么理得出来哇。。。
A: Elizabeth Cady Stanton was a call..
B: A draft of the Declaration of Sentiments was adopted.
C:语法正确,意思也可以先保留
D:没有谓语动词
E:语法和意思都正确,和C的区别在于E明确指出了include的发出者就是ECS这个人
A. 缺少主语
B. that ECS wrote的宾语从句修饰不当
C. a call for female..在起草前就被囊括在其中了..不妥
D. 缺少谓语
E. correct
C when X..., Y... 表示X和Y是在同一时间发生,该选项中主句had been done的时态表示不是同一时间
为什么会错选B....
B中that后面修饰对象搞错了...Cady draft的是declaration
draft:起草。主语应该是人
when adopted ,a call included in
when drafted, a call included in
逻辑上,是在写的时候include内容
ron:
if you write "when X, Y"...
Y has to be IN THE SAME TIMEFRAME as X.
that's the whole point of the "when" construction.
the "had ___ed" tense implies a DIFFERENT (earlier) timeframe, so, it's nonsense in that context.
C !是的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
我觉得E选项后半句改成,she included a call for female enfranchisement in it.更好更清晰?
enfranchisement, included
included 逻辑上修饰enfranchisement
C是when引导的状语从句修饰,导致的语义错误。
当declaration被采用的时候,一个有关女性解放的呼吁被包括了进去。when做状语,修饰的是included的动词。这句话没什么逻辑关系。如果是当declaration被采用的时候,一个有关女性解放的呼吁被引起,是合乎逻辑意思的。
E当ECS起草declaration(被在1848采用的宣言)的时候,她把女性解放的呼吁加了进去。逻辑更通畅。
关于被动语态:虽然ETS不区分主被动的优劣,但是被动的一个问题是,如果没有明确动作发出这(比如by,from等介词没有出现),就很容易导致主语不清的情况出现。比如C选项的has been included,可以by ECS,也可以by president,还可以by Barack Obama..等等。
说得好
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
F更应该是when Elizabenth **was drafting** the .... that was adopted in 1848, she included in it a call .... 不是么?
C的完成时哪里错了?在was adopted之前,就已经had been included了,没错啊。
C说的是include这个动作发生在adopt之前,没说在draft之前
When引导的从句和主句代表同时发生,要一个时态
My mum had been teaching for ten years when I was ten. 这句子有错么?
过去完成时的动作是不能持续到现在的。
过去完成时的动作在过去的过去发生,在过去(simple past)已经结束,强调的是对过去(simple past)有影响。这道题的include在过去发生,但是将一直持续,用过去完成时是不对的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
B that修饰Convention,错;应该修饰draft
C 过去完成时 错
我也觉得she included in it a call好奇怪啊,include的用法不是应该include sth. in...把什么包含在内,还有就是这个it指代谁?
C错用完成时态,以及使用了被动语态,没有强调动作发出者。
这种长句做起来好花时间,远远大于2分钟;光是读完就得花1:30了