Solar ponds are bodies of water in which circulation is incomplete and there is a very high salt concentration that increases with depth. This vertical change in salinity serves to trap heat because concentrated brine in the lowest water level acts as a collector and storage area for solar heat, while the less saline, lighter water at the upper levels provides insulation. Heat is thus retained in the depths.
An artificial pond of this type has been constructed on the western shore of the Dead Sea in Israel in order to test its suitability as a source of low-grade heat for conversion into electricity. An immediate threat to the success of the venture was the growth of algae. Water in solar ponds must be kept maximally transparent to allow penetration of light to the deep storage area. Therefore, any particles of matter in the water, such as algae cells, that scatter or absorb light will interfere with the collection of heat.
One proposed method of controlling the algae was the application of an algicide. However, the Dead Sea is a closed body of water without any outlet and as such is very easily contaminated. Extensive use of chemicals in numerous future full-scale solar ponds would lead to such contamination of the Dead Sea, which now enjoys a lucrative tourist trade.
A recent experiment has supplied a more promising method for controlling the algae. To repress the algae cells' capacity for accommodating themselves to environmental changes, the water in the solar pond was first made more saline through evaporation and then diluted by a rapid inflow of fresh water. This shock reduced the cells' ability to regulate the movement of water through their membranes. They rapidly absorbed water, resulting in distortions of shape, increase in volume, and impairment to motility. Their buoyancy adversely affected, the cells sank to the bottom of the pond, where they encountered the hot waters of the storage layer and were destroyed. This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use.
Which of the following, if true, would seriously undermine the validity of the conclusions drawn from the experiment described in the last paragraph of the passage?
The algae cells that sank to the bottom of the pond were destroyed only after a time lag of twenty-four hours.
The lateral motility of the algae cells that sank to the bottom of the pond was not impaired.
The water with which the artificial solar pond was diluted contained microorganisms that kill algae.
The algae cells that sank to the bottom of the pond were actually killed by the rapid change in pressure.
The higher salinity brought about through evaporation increased the transparency of the upper levels of water in the pond.
题目分析:
题目释义:
细节题目
考点:
逻辑结构(Logical structure)
旨在考察我们对文章结构的认知,以及对作者行文目的的判断。
我们首先要找到最后一段那个实验作者的结论是什么,是“This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use”这个论点可供攻击的点是“清洁”和“有效”。注意题目问的是削弱。
选项分析:
A选项:沉入底部的藻类细胞只有经过24小时后才能被破坏。从“有效”方面攻击。但是24小时这个时间并不影响这个方法的有效性。
B选项:沉入底部的藻类细胞只有经过24小时后才能被破坏。从“有效”方面攻击。但是24小时这个时间并不影响这个方法的有效性。
C选项:Correct. 稀释人工太阳能池的水中含有杀死水藻的微生物。两方面攻击,“清洁”方面有微生物不知道是否能保持死海的清洁。“有效”方面我们无从得知究竟是作者说的原因还是这些微生物杀死了藻类细胞。
D选项:沉入底部的藻类细胞其实是被骤变的压力所杀死的。这个选项较易误选。注意这个选项并不能严重的削弱作者的结论。作者的结论是有效的杀死和清洁。该选项不反驳其中任何一点,只是作者说的消灭机理有问题。
E选项:更高的盐度带来通过蒸发引起的上层水的透明度上升。该选项和作者的结论无关。
To repress the algae cells' capacity for accommodating themselves to environmental changes, 为了压制藻类细胞适应环境变化的能力,for表用途:The knife is used for cutting things.
作者对这个method的评价是:This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use.
这种方法可以有效控制algae,同时保证solar ponds是可以为人类提供能源的最干净的技术之一。
choice a, 沉到底部的海藻必须等24小时才可以被杀死,无关
choice b, 沉到底部的海藻横向移动能力没有被破坏,无关。只要保证可以沉到底部就可以
choice c, 用来稀释pond的水包含微生物,微生物杀死algae。choice C没有攻击effectiveness,但是攻击了'clean'
choice d,沉到底部的海藻实际是被压力的突然变化杀死的,无关
choice e,更高的盐都增加了上层水的透明度,无关
choice b, 沉到底部的海藻横向移动能力没有被破坏,无关。只要保证可以沉到底部就可以
这个有关。沉到底部是因为移动能力被破坏,如果移动能力完好或留存部分,是不是就不会沉到底部了。这样就不会被烫死。
我又回去读了一下,我是这么理解的哈:
定位resulting in distortions of shape, increase in volume, and impairment to motility。新方案对海藻的直接影响是变形-体积增加-移动能力被破坏。(我理解motility包括纵向运动和横向运动两种的。)
Their buoyancy adversely affected, the cells sank to the bottom of the pond。 因为浮力的反向作用,细胞沉到了罐子底部。
但是要仔细注意choice b里面的定语:algae cells that sank to the bottom of the pond……也就是对象限定在了已经沉淀到罐底的海藻,所以不管横向运动能力有没有破坏都已经没关系了,只到沉下去了就可以保证接下去encounter hot water and destroy。因此没法削弱方案的有效性
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
if (c) is true, then the algae may not have been killed by the procedure at all; they may have been killed by the microorganisms that were introduced.
它因
题目没看仔细
如果下列哪一项是正确的,将削弱从文章最后一段所描述的实验中得出的结论的有效性?
【思路点拨】
定位最后一段
这种方法可以有效地控制有害藻类,同时使太阳能池成为最清洁的技术之一,为人类提供能源。
任何能让降低这个方法有效性的因素,都能削弱该结论。
A 沉入池塘底部的藻类细胞在24小时后才被破坏。 无关 方法能让藻类细胞沉到低,杀死藻类就行
B沉到池塘底部的藻类细胞的横向运动没有受到影响。 无关 方法能让藻类细胞沉到低,杀死藻类就行
C人工太阳能池被稀释的水中含有杀死藻类的微生物。 正确 原文提到藻类是在底部遇热死亡的,沉淀在底部,换言之,藻类需要活着才能吸水,下沉。 而微生物杀死了藻类的话,水藻就无法下沉,挡住了阳光的吸收,干扰了太阳池的使用。
D 下沉到池塘底部的藻类细胞实际上是被迅速变化压力杀死的。无关 方法能让藻类细胞沉到低,杀死藻类就行
E 通过蒸发带来的高盐度增加了池塘上层水的透明度。无关
赞
赞
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
加水稀释--细胞浮力破坏--沉底遇热和死亡。
这题并不能提取为措施目的题,因为措施是加水,目的是细胞沉底死亡,中间有一大堆需要解释的,不是common sense.
这题只能提取为原因结果:加水,水使溶液稀释——细胞无法适应浓度变化,失去浮力,沉底死亡。
所以如果这题理解为原因结果题,那C很明显是它因削弱。
首先找到此实验的结论: 最后一句话- effective control of algae+ leave solar ponds cleanest
C选项提出它因: 是微生物控制algae [而不是第三段解释的一堆原理] + 有了微生物-削弱cleanest
A: 原文并没有提及时间—无关;B: 原文说的是sank过程,此选项说lateral,无关
D: 迷惑选项, killed by pressure change---这还是第三段提出的新方法中的过程,只能说明对此方法的 解读有误,无法说明该方案得到的结论错误!
This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use. 这句是C. 有微生物不知道是否能保持死海的清洁。
有可能是其他原因导致了海藻死亡,不一定是方法本身的原因,因此削弱
有微生物不知道是否能保持死海的清洁。而且无从得知究竟是作者说的原因还是这些微生物杀死了藻类细胞。
赞
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
实验是先蒸发增大浓度,再加入清水稀释减小浓度,以此破坏细胞膜的透水性,杀死细胞
但是被稀释的水会导致杀细胞的微生物减少,offset or overweight the proposed benefits-----no goal,杀不死、杀不完
结论是这个是最清洁的科技 所以c削弱了
我觉得weaken的主要原因应该是因为做实验的时候水里含了能杀死algae的细菌。也就是说杀死algae并不是因为文字指出的通过浓度变化让algae挂掉。这样理解是不是更直接。因为是不是clean其实也有点irrelevant。主要判断的结论是 水的浓度变化 杀死 algae, weaken选项,其他因素杀死了algae,并非水的浓度。
我同意你的分析;觉得是他因导致C选项削弱。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
algae 海藻
笔记:果然还要满足cleanest technology这一项,做的时候不自信
lateral 横向的
This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use.
审清楚题 问的是最后一段的conclusions,所以应定位最后一句This method allows for....(既清除了藻类又使solar ponds最cleanest) 问削弱,c:solar ponds 含有 microorganisms, 削弱了cleanest
The lateral motility横向运动能力。。。无关
A不削弱不加强
B注意是lateral,如果是vertical则是削弱
D不削弱结论,压力杀死结论依然成立
E加强方向
C削弱了cleanest