Solar ponds are bodies of water in which circulation is incomplete and there is a very high salt concentration that increases with depth. This vertical change in salinity serves to trap heat because concentrated brine in the lowest water level acts as a collector and storage area for solar heat, while the less saline, lighter water at the upper levels provides insulation. Heat is thus retained in the depths.
An artificial pond of this type has been constructed on the western shore of the Dead Sea in Israel in order to test its suitability as a source of low-grade heat for conversion into electricity. An immediate threat to the success of the venture was the growth of algae. Water in solar ponds must be kept maximally transparent to allow penetration of light to the deep storage area. Therefore, any particles of matter in the water, such as algae cells, that scatter or absorb light will interfere with the collection of heat.
One proposed method of controlling the algae was the application of an algicide. However, the Dead Sea is a closed body of water without any outlet and as such is very easily contaminated. Extensive use of chemicals in numerous future full-scale solar ponds would lead to such contamination of the Dead Sea, which now enjoys a lucrative tourist trade.
A recent experiment has supplied a more promising method for controlling the algae. To repress the algae cells' capacity for accommodating themselves to environmental changes, the water in the solar pond was first made more saline through evaporation and then diluted by a rapid inflow of fresh water. This shock reduced the cells' ability to regulate the movement of water through their membranes. They rapidly absorbed water, resulting in distortions of shape, increase in volume, and impairment to motility. Their buoyancy adversely affected, the cells sank to the bottom of the pond, where they encountered the hot waters of the storage layer and were destroyed. This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use.
Which of the following, if true, would seriously undermine the validity of the conclusions drawn from the experiment described in the last paragraph of the passage?
The algae cells that sank to the bottom of the pond were destroyed only after a time lag of twenty-four hours.
The lateral motility of the algae cells that sank to the bottom of the pond was not impaired.
The water with which the artificial solar pond was diluted contained microorganisms that kill algae.
The algae cells that sank to the bottom of the pond were actually killed by the rapid change in pressure.
The higher salinity brought about through evaporation increased the transparency of the upper levels of water in the pond.
题目分析:
题目释义:
细节题目
考点:
逻辑结构(Logical structure)
旨在考察我们对文章结构的认知,以及对作者行文目的的判断。
我们首先要找到最后一段那个实验作者的结论是什么,是“This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use”这个论点可供攻击的点是“清洁”和“有效”。注意题目问的是削弱。
选项分析:
A选项:沉入底部的藻类细胞只有经过24小时后才能被破坏。从“有效”方面攻击。但是24小时这个时间并不影响这个方法的有效性。
B选项:沉入底部的藻类细胞只有经过24小时后才能被破坏。从“有效”方面攻击。但是24小时这个时间并不影响这个方法的有效性。
C选项:Correct. 稀释人工太阳能池的水中含有杀死水藻的微生物。两方面攻击,“清洁”方面有微生物不知道是否能保持死海的清洁。“有效”方面我们无从得知究竟是作者说的原因还是这些微生物杀死了藻类细胞。
D选项:沉入底部的藻类细胞其实是被骤变的压力所杀死的。这个选项较易误选。注意这个选项并不能严重的削弱作者的结论。作者的结论是有效的杀死和清洁。该选项不反驳其中任何一点,只是作者说的消灭机理有问题。
E选项:更高的盐度带来通过蒸发引起的上层水的透明度上升。该选项和作者的结论无关。
文章的最后一段的最后一句话对该方案的评价是既清除了藻类又保护了水资源不被污染。c,虽然藻类被清除了,但是水还是被污染了。所以削弱了文章的第二个方案
correction for my last post:
the correct answer should weaken the conclusion in both ways: weakening the validity of effective control and the cleanest technologies at the same time.
this sentence is the conclusion: This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae while leaving solar ponds as one of the cleanest technologies providing energy for human use.
we want to weak the conclusion->how? ->weakening either the validity of "effective control" or the one of "the cleanest technologies" is fine.
The experiment: made more saline + a rapid inflow of fresh water --> reduced the cells' ability to regulate the movement of water through their membranes (sank and were destroyed).
The conclusion: This method allows for effective control of nuisance algae.
C: algae were actually killed by microorganisms rather than the method described in the paragraph (made more saline + a rapid inflow of fresh water). Undermine.
weaken cleanest technologies
对题目的理解有误,对题目中的conclusion句子判断有误
b选项即使没有失去行动能力但依然encountered the hot waters of the storage layer and were destroyed
c选项证明海藻死亡是由于稀释带来的微生物而不是the shock reduced the cells' ability to regulate the movement of water through their membranes,因此用其他原因weaken
d选项说是被压力杀死而不是遇到了热水杀死为什么就不能weaken了呢?
Even though the passage implies that the hot waters of the storage layer killed the algae, this still reinforces the method used to get the algae to the bottom, where it dies.
c weaken的是cleanest technologies
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
cleanest technologies
认真读选项的意思!