A mixture of poems and short fiction, Jean Toomer's Cane has been called one of the three best novels ever written by Black Americans—the others being Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man.
Black Americans—the others being Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man
Black Americans—including Native Son by Richard Wright and Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison
a Black American—including Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man
a Black American—the others being Richard Wright, author of Native Son, and Ralph Ellison, author of Invisible Man
a Black American—the others being Richard Wright's Native Son and Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man
题目分析:
略。
选项分析:
A选项:破折号之前的主语是Cane这本书,后面平行的也需要对应是书而不是人,而本选项中破折号身后都是人;Black Americans和a Black American均是正确的。
B选项:介词including需改为the others being。include是“包括”的意思,当我们用它的时候,可能表示全部子集或者部分子集,例如:
Cars include Benz, BMW, and Audi.
这个例句中,显然小汽车的品牌不止BBA这三种。在本题中,显然三个最好的小说已经全了,即,Native Son和Invisible Man是剩余的全部了(前面已经说了Cane了),所以应该用更准确的the other being。
C选项:破折号后面的平行错误同(A);介词including措辞错误同选项(B)。
D选项:破折号后面的平行错误同(A)。
E选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
要看3个是啥,是3个美国黑人还是3部作品?不要被离得最近的Black American给迷惑了,是“ three best novels”
[including的坑]
including表示子集,但是这边说清楚了一共有三个,已知一个,还有两个。属于全集,所以不能用including 排除BC选项
A选项:破折号前主语是书本(物),破折号后也应该是物,本选项是人❌
D选项:错误同A❌
E选项:✅
ae之间
one of the three best novels 后面the others当然也要修饰书而不是人
the others being Richard Wright's Native Son
including不对 好像前面小说包括后面两本似的 而且 the others being是为数不多的being正确用法
平行,前面的是书那后面的也必须是书,排除acd
且前面是Jean Toomer's Cane,(b) is not as parallel as (e), either. since the original says "jean toomer's cane", the others should also have the form "X's Y", not "Y by X".
RON:
word choice is a sticky thing. for instance, it's actually better to say "birds have a four-chambered heart" than to say "birds have four-chambered hearts", because the former makes it clear that each bird has exactly 1 heart. both, however, are acceptable.
in a similar vein, the construction of (d) and (e) makes it more clear that each book has exactly 1 author.
其实错选B的时候也有犹豫一下。。。因为including通常是直接说某一个东西包含的全部内容 显然这里破折号后是部分内容而不是全部内容
RON:
word choice is a sticky thing. for instance, it's actually better to say "birds have a four-chambered heart" than to say "birds have four-chambered hearts", because the former makes it clear that each bird has exactly 1 heart. both, however, are acceptable.
in a similar vein, the construction of (d) and (e) makes it more clear that each book has exactly 1 author.
one of the three novels 后面应该是小说,不是人
B black ameican应该用单数
RON: 关于 Black Americans和a Black American 解释 :
word choice is a sticky thing. for instance, it's actually better to say "birds have a four-chambered heart" than to say "birds have four-chambered hearts", because the former makes it clear that each bird has exactly 1 heart. both, however, are acceptable.
in a similar vein, the construction of (d) and (e) makes it more clear that each book has exactly 1 author.
感谢搬运~
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
破折号后跟独立主格,从句宾语和主句主语保持一致:"the others being Richard Wright's Native Son and Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man"
破折号的意思不应该是解释说明的吗?破折号也可以表示平行?
破折号是解释, 但解释要对应前面的名词呀, 前面的名词是书.很多选项变成解释人了.
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
Being+n.不一定错,因为后面可以还原为the others 【are】Richard Wright's Native Son and Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man
单数的理解:这三本书的每一本都是由一位黑人作家所写。
2.including的意思与the others being的意思细微的不同。
由于一共就三本书,前面写了一本了,只剩下两本,所以用the others being更加准确。是being为数不多的正确用法
3.平行,前面的是书那后面的也必须是书,排除acd
且前面是Jean Toomer's Cane,(b) is not as parallel as (e), either. since the original says "jean toomer's cane", the others should also have the form "X's Y", not "Y by X".
1.单复数问题:novels ever written by Black Americans/a Black American都可以。
借用Ron大神的例子,birds have a four-chambered heart和birds have four-chambered hearts,这两个都可以,且前者更好。套用到本题上就是,the three best novels这一类书都有一个特点,即由一个黑人作者所写。
the others being是做什么成分什么意思呢,being不是表同时性吗,觉得在这里有点多余,所以选了B
注意平行结构
including 和 the others being 的区别
前面的JT’s cane....还是平行啊
RON:in this case, parallel structure is pretty easy. the sentence makes it clear that you're comparing novels, not their authors, so (a), (c), and (d) are instantly out because their second halves mistakenly mention the people themselves as part of the comparison.
(b) is not as parallel as (e), either. since the original says "jean toomer's cane", the others should also have the form "X's Y", not "Y by X".
这个解释非常清楚!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论