Some theorists and critics insist that no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist. This opinion is clearly false. The only sound aesthetic evaluations of artists’ works are those that take into account factors such as the era and the place of the artists’ births, their upbringing and education, and the values of their societies—in sum, those factors that are part of their cultural background.
The above argument is most vulnerable to which of the following objections?
The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
The argument cites evidence that undermines rather than supports the conclusion.
The argument draws its conclusion by means of an equivocal interpretation of key terms.
The argument assumes that the production of an effect is evidence of an intention to produce that effect.
The argument assumes that evaluative disputes can be resolved by citing factual evidence.
别人:evaluation 不应该base on 文化背景
作者结论:这是错的。由此可得,作者的结论=别人结论的逆否命题=evaluation应该base on 文化背景。
作者的premise:因为evaluation就应该base on文化背景。
这里可以发现:作者的evidence/premise=作者的结论
所以作者其实根本就没提供evidence,他只是重复讲了自己的结论
由此可以找到和选项A相同的地方,purports to provide evidence,其实就只是声称而已
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论