扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATAdvanced-CR-34
Mashika: We already know from polling data that some segments of the electorate provide significant support to Ms. Puerta. If those segments also provide significant support to Mr. Quintana, then no segment of the electorate that provides significant support to Mr. Quintana provides significant support to Mr. Ramirez.
Salim: But actually, as the latest polling data conclusively shows, at least one segment of the electorate does provide significant support to both Mr. Quintana and Mr. Ramirez.
Among the following statements, which is it most reasonable to infer from the assertions by Mashika and Salim?
At least one segment of the electorate provides significant support neither to Mr. Quintana nor to Mr. Ramirez.
At least one segment of the electorate provides significant support to Ms. Puerta but not to Mr. Quintana.
Each segment of the electorate provides significant support to Ms. Puerta.
Each segment of the electorate provides significant support to Mr. Quintana.
Each segment of the electorate provides significant support to Mr. Ramirez.
回过头来看...A我怎么感觉也是对的...因为前文说支持p的那些人要是同时支持q的话，所有支持q的人就没有一个支持r的了。说明这些支持p的人当下应该都不支持r，同时也不支持q啊，难道不是吗？
文章说的是：支持p的选区如果同时支持q的话，这些支持q的选区没有一个支持r的了。当条件不成立，支持p的人不都支持q，那支持q的人也就不一定不支持r。大概就是一个选区只能支持两个人的意思吧。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论