扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / GMATAdvanced-CR-34
Mashika: We already know from polling data that some segments of the electorate provide significant support to Ms. Puerta. If those segments also provide significant support to Mr. Quintana, then no segment of the electorate that provides significant support to Mr. Quintana provides significant support to Mr. Ramirez.
Salim: But actually, as the latest polling data conclusively shows, at least one segment of the electorate does provide significant support to both Mr. Quintana and Mr. Ramirez.
Among the following statements, which is it most reasonable to infer from the assertions by Mashika and Salim?
At least one segment of the electorate provides significant support neither to Mr. Quintana nor to Mr. Ramirez.
At least one segment of the electorate provides significant support to Ms. Puerta but not to Mr. Quintana.
Each segment of the electorate provides significant support to Ms. Puerta.
Each segment of the electorate provides significant support to Mr. Quintana.
Each segment of the electorate provides significant support to Mr. Ramirez.
第一段逻辑链：当某些选区支持p的同时支持Q时——这些选区不会支持r
第二段逻辑：有些支持Q的却支持r了
想要让两段都合理，就是说明，第二段中支持Q的那些选区不是第一段所限定的选区，即这些支持Q的并非同时支持p，这样就不是第一段所要求的选区，也就可能会支持r。
此时两段同时合理。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论