C：overlook不能加that，只能直接加宾语。如overlook the fact that。
同样不能that的有
ask, refuse, cause, force, condemn, admire, like/dislike, celebrate这些后面都不能直接接that，但可以用it 或者 the fact 作为媒介

能直接接that从句的大概有这么几类：
1. 观点类动词：think, suppose, assume
2. 认知类动词：know, understand, notice
3. 转述类动词：say, report
4. 希冀类动词：hope, expect
5. 赞同类动词：agree, approve
6. 承认类动词：admit, acknowledge
7. 决定类动词：decide, conclude
8. 记忆类动词：remember, recall
9. 发现类动词：discover, find
10. 请求、建议、命令类：require, suggest, order

1.Rhetorical construction，possibility和could都表达可能，重复了，AB错.
2.代词，it指代不明，不太好，AB不太好
3.idiom，overlook是及物动词，overlooking that the forces中的that不需要，C错.Overlook the fact that...是对的，另外还有despite the fact that...
4.逻辑推理，repeat的对象应该是disaster，而不是forces，ABD错。
补充：这些单词都不能直接接that从句
allow
refuse
let
like
cause
force
condemn
celebrate
dislike
entreat
love
help
overlook
loathe
forgive
take（认为）

Advanced的题目真心在提示我们，虽然看起来很废话的选项，未必是错的。
这个题有意思就有意思在句意表达是否能够完整。原句意思其实很容易看出来是：对于地震或洪水造成的灾害的天然反应就是在原地重建，但是这种反应没考虑到（在原地）会再次发生灾害的可能性。
A/B it 指代不明，根据句意得出这里应该是disaster；但是考虑到代词指代经常bug,所以这里最致命的问题在于：
A： forces....could be repeated
B: forces...could be repeated
明显句意错误，所以要排除修饰来看，这两处才是要命的
同理排除D
C; forces could also cause another one...another one what?
E：修正了another one带来的歧义，虽然看起来很啰嗦但是句意清晰

D项：灾难不能被重复

overlook不能加that

The malicious modifier: The comma + verb-ing action modifier “overlooking the possibility…” logically modifies the preceding action “is to rebuild” by presenting the result of this action. However, this modifier fails to logically connect with the subject of the modified action, “A natural response.” It does not make much sense to say that a response overlooks something. It makes more sense to say devasted communities overlook the possibility. But this connection is not possible in this sentence.
The problematic pronoun: The sentence uses the singular pronoun “it” but has no antecedent for it. Did you ask why it cannot refer to “earthquake” or “flood“? It cannot because the sentence does not talk about communities affected by an earthquake or a flood. The sentence talks about communities that get ruined by any natural calamity.
The minced-up meaning: The last part of the sentence says, “… the forces… could be repeated.” This meaning is totally illogical. It is clear from the context of the sentence that natural calamities such as earthquakes or floods can reoccur at the same site.
The ridiculous redundancy: The sentence uses “possibility” and “could” to talk about the same event. The usage of both words together makes the sentence redundant.

考点：
1. overlook sth固定用法。没看见过 overlook that...从句，排除C。
2. 指示代词的指代问题，A&B的it指代不明。another one, such disaster才是正解。
3. v-ing serves to refer to the nearest preceding action and the performer of that action. 用condiering 而不用overlooking很重要的一点时避免歧义，前者的performer跟to rebuild一致，后者的performer有可能指the site。

官方解释排除C：
C. This choice uses the idiomatically incorrect form overlooking that. This choice is confusing also because overlooking has a physical meaning that can apply, for example, to a site but does not fit with overlooking that.

参考自：https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-natural-response-of-communities-devastated-by-earthquake-or-flood-is-47386.html

disaster will be repeated, not forces
overlook 后边不直接跟that从句， usually, overlook the fact that ...

C项 overlook后面不能跟that从句，another one指代不明
E项another such disaster解决了C项指代不明的问题，可见成分复杂一点不一定就错

force不能被重复

原句中就出现表达有误的情况，与D相似

AB的问题是： it指代不明，而且主干是forces could be repeated这是不对的。
C错在overlook后面要加宾语，不能直接加that
D的主干是forces could be repeated这是不对的。

overlook the fact that 不直接加宾语从句 D force被重复 逻辑不通

overlook the fact that 不直接加宾语从句 D force被重复 逻辑不通

overlook 后面不可以接宾从，只有overlook the fact that
ask, refuse, cause, force, condemn, admire, like/dislike, celebrate这些后面都不能直接接that，但可以用it 或者 the fact 作为媒介
主要的判断方式就是拿到一个词看一下接that 从句会不会很奇怪或者之前从没见过
大部分动词后面都不能直接that从句，比如什么eat, drink, make, take, play, appreciate, do, goi等，这些都能判断

错选了D，the force could be repeated, 错误意思，应该是disaster could be repeated
“ask, refuse, cause, force, condemn, admire, like/dislike, celebrate这些后面都不能直接接that，但可以用it 或者 the fact 作为媒介”--》overlook 不能用that连接或者带宾语从句
overlook sth

****************难题，要再看/////
Overlook后面不能接宾语从句，类似的还有ask, refuse, cause, force, condemn, admire, like/dislike, celebrate，所以C不对//
AB错在It//DE不知道改怎么排除

overlook不能接that

overlook 后面不可以接宾从，只有overlook the fact that
ask, refuse, cause, force, condemn, admire, like/dislike, celebrate这些后面都不能直接接that，但可以用it 或者 the fact 作为媒介
主要的判断方式就是拿到一个词看一下接that 从句会不会很奇怪或者之前从没见过
大部分动词后面都不能直接that从句，比如什么eat, drink, make, take, play, appreciate, do, goi等，这些都能判断
能直接接that从句的大概有这么几类：

本句的真正意思在于 这种对于灾难的反应忽略了这么一件事: 这种力量还可能导致另一次的地震或洪水 因此需要用 such disaster 特指上文出现过的地震或洪水这两种类型的disaster
而不是其他类型灾难 比如泥石流等