A natural response of communities devastated by earthquake or flood is to rebuild on the same site, overlooking the possibility that the forces that caused it could be repeated.
overlooking the possibility that the forces that caused it could be repeated
overlooking the possibility that the forces causing it could be repeated
overlooking that the forces that caused the disaster could also cause another one
without considering that the forces causing the disaster could be repeated
without considering that the forces that caused the disaster could also cause another such disaster
语意;代词指代问题;对比选项从而分析语意考察点ce
前:overlooking和without considering都是及物动词,都可以
中:causing it这里的it指代不明,不应该用it;而应该是具体名词,到底是disaster还是flood等?对比de可知应该是disaster;
对比其他选线de,就知道cause后面加disaster肯定是更优的。排除ab
d:表达有误,力量会被重复,语意错误;
c:?语意排除法,单纯读c: the forces that caused the disaster could also cause another one,another one->还会发生另一个disaster,也可能是相似的也可能与之前发生的不相似,所以语意表达不到位;
是想要表达还会发生一样的disaster;
语意;代词指代问题;
前:overlooking和without considering都是及物动词,都可以
中:causing it这里的it指代不明,不应该用it;而应该是具体名词,到底是disaster还是flood等?对比de可知应该是disaster;
对比其他选线de,就知道cause后面加disaster肯定是更优的。排除ab
d:表达有误,力量会被重复,语意错误;
c:?语意排除法,单纯读c: the forces that caused the disaster could also cause another one,another one->还会发生另一个disaster,也可能是相似的也可能与之前发生的不相似,所以语意表达不到位;
是想要表达还会发生一样的disaster;
force could be repeated意思不对,应该是灾难重复
不是,前面有without的缘故,可以修饰的对象很多,原则上有合适的逻辑主语都能说得通,这里很明显是community登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
ask, refuse, cause, force, condemn, admire, like/dislike, celebrate这些后面都不能直接接that,但可以用it 或者 the fact 作为媒介
这些不能直接接that的词之间有什么联系么,还是只能死记硬背。。。
主要的判断方式就是拿到一个词看一下接that 从句会不会很奇怪或者之前从没见过大部分动词后面都不能直接that从句,比如什么eat, drink, make, take, play, appreciate, do, goi等,这些都能判断
能直接接that从句的大概有这么几类:
1. 观点类动词:think, suppose, assume
2. 认知类动词:know, understand, notice
3. 转述类动词:say, report
4. 希冀类动词:hope, expect
5. 赞同类动词:agree, approve
6. 承认类动词:admit, acknowledge
7. 决定类动词:decide, conclude
8. 记忆类动词:remember, recall
9. 发现类动词:discover, find
10. 请求、建议、命令类:require, suggest, order
太谢谢了!
手动点个赞!登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
C. This choice uses the idiomatically incorrect form overlooking that. This choice is confusing also because overlooking has a physical meaning that can apply, for example, to a site but does not fit with overlooking that.