In 1675, Louis XIV established the Parisian seamstresses' guild, the first independent all-female guild created in over 200 years. Guild members could make and sell women's and children's clothing, but were prohibited from producing men's clothing or dresses for court women. Tailors resented the ascension of seamstresses to guild status; seamstresses, meanwhile, were impatient with the remaining restrictions on their right to clothe women.
The conflict between the guilds was not purely economic, however. A 1675 police report indicated that since so many seamstresses were already working illegally, the tailors were unlikely to suffer additional economic damage because of the seamstresses' incorporation. Moreover, guild membership held very different meanings for tailors and seamstresses. To the tailors, their status as guild members overlapped with their role as heads of household, and entitled them to employ as seamstresses female family members who did not marry outside the trade. The seamstresses, however, viewed guild membership as a mark of independence from the patriarchal family. Their guild was composed not of family units but of individual women who enjoyed unusual legal and economic privileges. At the conflict's center was the issue of whether tailors' female relatives should be identified as family members protected by the tailors' guild or as individuals under the jurisdiction of the seamstresses' guild.
The author mentions the seamstresses' view of guild membership as a "mark of independence from the patriarchal family" primarily in order to
emphasize that the establishment of the seamstresses' guild had implications that were not solely economic
illustrate the conflict that existed between tailors and their female family members over membership in the tailors' guild
imply that the establishment of the seamstresses' guild ushered in a period of increased economic and social freedom for women in France
provide an explanation for the dramatic increase in the number of women working as seamstresses after 1675
indicate that members of the seamstresses' guild were financially more successful than were tailors' female relatives protected by the tailors' guild
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
A 选项是正确答案。文中提到,裁缝的女性亲属应该被认为是由裁缝行会保护的家庭成员,还是应该被认为是受裁缝工会管辖的个体?因此,作者提到裁缝工会成员视会员资格为从家长权威独立出来的标志,在这里的主要目的是强调工会的建立不仅对经济产生了影响,而且在人们的社会关系上也产生了影响。
B. conflict between tailors and their female family members:裁缝和女性家属之间的矛盾,错误,应该是两个guild之间的矛盾
B矛盾不是在男裁缝和它们的女性家庭成员之间,第二段首句The conflict between the guilds矛盾是存在于男裁缝协会和新建立的女裁缝协会之间。
看懂文章之后题目其实都不难,但问题就是一开始看不懂。。。。。。。。。
B的错误点在于conflict后面那个定语从句的描述是有问题的。不是tailors和他们的女性家庭成员之间的矛盾。并且over membership in the tailors' guild这个描述也有问题,tailors对于guild的观念和seamstress对于guild的观念是冲突的
The conflict between the guilds was not purely economic, however.
没有提到social freedom,只关乎她们自己的独立
not solely → tailor, and seamstress
b,矛盾点不对
c,没提到 social freedom, in France也没提及
d是为什么呢?
B选项的矛盾点有问题!不是南裁缝和其女性家庭成员之间的矛盾,而是男裁缝协会和女裁缝协会之间的矛盾。而且第二段首句就提到了矛盾不仅仅只局限于经济方面,接下来分别从男、女裁缝角度展开。
不能一看到conflict就选B啊!
B选项错在over membership in the tailors' guild。我的理解是因为女裁缝协会的存在,威胁到男裁缝请家里的女裁缝干活、作老大的权利,而不是纠结于 membership in the tailors' guild
At the conflict's center was the issue of whether tailors' female relatives should be identified as family members protected by the tailors' guild or as individuals under the jurisdiction of the seam-stresses' guild.错选B项,因为定位到这句话,选项说的是membership为了证明存在冲突。实际上,第一段就说明了存在冲突,第二段开始提出一个观点:冲突不仅仅存在于经济方面,Moreover,就接着用这个例子论述。所以A项更准确!