The term "episodic memory" was introduced by Tulving to refer to what he considered a uniquely human capacity—the ability to recollect specific past events, to travel back into the past in one's own mind—as distinct from the capacity simply to use information acquired through past experiences. Subsequently, Clayton et al. developed criteria to test for episodic memory in animals. According to these criteria, episodic memories are not of individual bits of information; they involve multiple components of a single event "bound" together. Clayton sought to examine evidence of scrub jays' accurate memory of "what," "where," and "when" information and their binding of this information. In the wild, these birds store food for retrieval later during periods of food scarcity. Clayton's experiment required jays to remember the type, location, and freshness of stored food based on a unique learning event. Crickets were stored in one location and peanuts in another. Jays prefer crickets, but crickets degrade more quickly. Clayton's birds switched their preference from crickets to peanuts once the food had been stored for a certain length of time, showing that they retain information about the what, the where, and the when. Such experiments cannot, however, reveal whether the birds were reexperiencing the past when retrieving the information. Clayton acknowledged this by using the term "episodic-like" memory.


It can be inferred from the passage that both Tulving and Clayton would agree with which of the following statements?


Animals' abilities to use information about a specific past event are not conclusive evidence of episodic memory.

Animals do not share humans' abilities to reexperience the past through memory.

The accuracy of animals' memories is difficult to determine through direct experimentation.

Humans tend to recollect single bits of information more accurately than do animals.

The binding of different kinds of information is not a distinctive feature of episodic memory.

考题讲解

此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。

A. Animals abilities to use information about a specific past event are not conclusive evidence of episodic memory
正确。由阅读材料中的“The term episodic memory was introduced by Tulving to refer to what he considered a uniquely human capacitythe ability to recollect specific past events to travel back into the past in ones own mindas distinct from the capacity simply to use information acquired through past experiences”可以看出,Tulving和Clayton都认为,动物获取特定过去事件信息的能力不能作为情节记忆的有力证明。

展开显示

登录注册 后可以参加讨论

快来第一个发言吧
GMATLA-RC