The term "episodic memory" was introduced by Tulving to refer to what he considered a uniquely human capacity—the ability to recollect specific past events, to travel back into the past in one's own mind—as distinct from the capacity simply to use information acquired through past experiences. Subsequently, Clayton et al. developed criteria to test for episodic memory in animals. According to these criteria, episodic memories are not of individual bits of information; they involve multiple components of a single event "bound" together. Clayton sought to examine evidence of scrub jays' accurate memory of "what," "where," and "when" information and their binding of this information. In the wild, these birds store food for retrieval later during periods of food scarcity. Clayton's experiment required jays to remember the type, location, and freshness of stored food based on a unique learning event. Crickets were stored in one location and peanuts in another. Jays prefer crickets, but crickets degrade more quickly. Clayton's birds switched their preference from crickets to peanuts once the food had been stored for a certain length of time, showing that they retain information about the what, the where, and the when. Such experiments cannot, however, reveal whether the birds were reexperiencing the past when retrieving the information. Clayton acknowledged this by using the term "episodic-like" memory.
It can be inferred that the author of the passage and Clayton would both agree that
the food preferences of the scrub jays in Clayton's experiment are difficult to explain
the presence of episodic memory cannot be inferred solely on the basis of observable behavior
Clayton's experiment demonstrated that scrub jays do not reexperience the past but do exhibit episodic-like memory
Tulving substantially underestimated the ability of animals to bind different kinds of information
Clayton's experiment had certain fundamental design flaws that make it difficult to draw any conclusions about scrub jay's memories
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 B。该文章犹如一个论文,详细阐述了Clayton的实验和他总结出来的“野鸟可以准确地记忆what where and when 信息并将这些信息绑定在一起”这一结论。但是文章也提到,因为Clayton的实验不能表明鸟儿是在回顾过去,所以他使用“episodic-like”(像情景记忆)的术语。因此,文中的作者和Clayton都会同意选项B“仅仅根据可观察的行为,不能推断出情景记忆的存在”。
不要脑补第二个人和作者对第一个人的看法
D。Tulving substantially underestimated the ability of animals to bind different kinds of information
第一个人低估了动物bind的能力
第一个人根本没提bind,第一个人只说了热 experience,bind是第二个人提 出来的标准
B。 the presence of episodic memory cannot be inferred solely on the basis of observable behavior
对应最后一句like