Extensive research has shown that the effects of short-term price promotions on sales are themselves short-term. Companies' hopes that promotions might have a positive aftereffect have not been borne out for reasons that researchers have been able to identify. A price promotion entices only a brand's long-term or "loyal" customers; people seldom buy an unfamiliar brand merely because the price is reduced. They simply avoid paying more than they have to when one of their customary brands is temporarily available at a reduced price. A price promotion does not increase the number of long-term customers of a brand, as it attracts virtually no new customers in the first place. Nor do price promotions have lingering aftereffects for a brand, even negative ones such as damage to a brand's reputation or erosion of customer loyalty, as is often feared.
So why do companies spend so much on price promotions? Clearly price promotions are generally run at a loss, otherwise there would be more of them. And the bigger the increase in sales at promotion prices, the bigger the loss. While short-term price promotions can have legitimate uses, such as reducing excess inventory, it is the recognizable increase in sales that is their main attraction to management, which is therefore reluctant to abandon this strategy despite its effect on the bottom line.
According to the passage, which of the following is the reason why short-term price promotions do not attract new long-term customers to a brand?
Short-term price promotions do not produce an increase in sales.
Customers come to regard the promotional price as the fair price and the regular price as excessive.
Most customers select among competing products largely on the basis of price and very few are loyal to any particular brand.
Customers who have not previously bought the promoted brand are almost never persuaded to do so by the short-term price promotions.
Any customers that a brand gains by means of a short-term price promotion are liable to be lost when a competing brand has a similar promotion.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 D。
由文章可知,短期价格促销不能吸引新的长期客户,原因是消费者不会因为价格的减少而购买一个他们不熟悉的品牌。文章解释说:“他们只是在他们习惯的品牌有暂时减价时避免支付更多的费用。价格促销并没有增加一个品牌的长期客户,因为它几乎没有吸引新客户。”因此,正确答案是 D:客户不会因为短期价格促销而购买推广的品牌。
A price promotion does not increase the number of long-term customers of a brand, as it attracts virtually no new customers in the first place. 一项促销活动并不会给这个品牌增加新的忠实顾客,因为促销活动本身就不会增加新顾客。
They simply avoid paying more than they have to when one of their customary brands is temporarily available at a reduced price.这句话的字面意识要结合上问“短期促销只对有品牌依赖性的某品牌长期客户有用”---为什么有用呢?----在品牌促销时会增加购买是因为”他们仅仅是为了避免比之前买的东西更贵(而在促销期买)“
"the bottom line" = “profit"
阅读时不够仔细(读的太快),没找准定位句:
A price promotion does not increase the number of long-term customers of a brand, as it attracts virtually no new customers in the first place.
【as 就是解释】
简直就是同义替换!!!
borne 是bear 的过去分词,bear out 的意思是:为……作证。customary 惯常的,习以为常的。
定位line4的句子,完全同义句改写!