The idea that equipping homes with electrical appliances and other "modern" household technologies would eliminate drudgery, save labor time, and increase leisure for women who were full-time home workers remained largely unchallenged until the women's movement of the 1970's spawned the groundbreaking and influential works of sociologist Joann Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan. Vanek analyzed 40 years of time use surveys conducted by home economists to argue that electrical appliances and other modern household technologies reduced the effort required to perform specific tasks, but ownership of these appliances did not correlate with less time spent on housework by full-time home workers. In fact, time spent by these workers remained remarkably constant―at about 52 to 54 hours per week―from the 1920's to the 1960's, a period of significant change in household technology. In surveying two centuries of household technology in the United States, Cowan argued that the "industrialization" of the home often resulted in more work for full-time home workers because the use of such devices as coal stoves, water pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended to reduce the workload of married-women's helpers (husbands, sons, daughters, and servants) while promoting a more rigorous standard of housework. The full-time home worker's duties also shifted to include more household management, child care, and the post-Second World War phenomenon of being "Mom's taxi."
The passage suggests that Vanek and Cowan would agree that modernizing household technology did not
reduce the workload of servants and other household helpers
raise the standard of housework that women who were full-time home workers set for themselves
decrease the effort required to perform household tasks
reduce the time spent on housework by women who were full-time home workers
result in a savings of money used for household maintenance
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
答案是 D. reduce the time spent on housework by women who were full-time home workers。
文章中提到,电器和其他现代家庭技术有助于减少单个任务的努力,但是对于全职家庭工人来说,拥有这些电器并没有与花费在家务上的时间相关。从1920年到1960年,家庭技术发生了重大变化,但是家庭工人花费的时间几乎没有变化,约是每周52-54小时。因此,Vanek和Cowan会同意,现代化家庭技术没有减少全职家庭工人花费在家务上的时间,所以答案是D。
又看错题,题目问的是did not
E不对是因为原文并没有suggest这个东西,其他就是要看到did not这个not
看清题目啊大哥,did not
没看见did not。。。
did not!!!
没看到did not o(╥﹏╥)o
c为什么不对
Vanek analyzed 40 years of timeuse surveys conducted by home economists to argue that electrical appliances and other modern household technologies reduced the effort required to perform specific
Cowan argued that the "industrialization" of the home often resulted in more work for full-time home workers 。
选成C了。did not decrease.......
定位句:but ownership of these appliances did not correlate with less time spent on housework by full-time home workers
Cowan argued that the "industrialization" of the home often resulted in more work for full-time home workers because the use of such devices as coal stoves, water pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended to reduce the workload of married-women's helpers
看题干不仔细...
did not...
文中tend to reduce the workload
但是Cowan argued that the "industrialization" of the home often resulted in more work for full-time home workers because the use of such devices as coal stoves, water pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended to reduce the workload of married-women's helpers
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
题干是did not