The idea that equipping homes with electrical appliances and other "modern" household technologies would eliminate drudgery, save labor time, and increase leisure for women who were full-time home workers remained largely unchallenged until the women's movement of the 1970's spawned the groundbreaking and influential works of sociologist Joann Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan. Vanek analyzed 40 years of time use surveys conducted by home economists to argue that electrical appliances and other modern household technologies reduced the effort required to perform specific tasks, but ownership of these appliances did not correlate with less time spent on housework by full-time home workers. In fact, time spent by these workers remained remarkably constant―at about 52 to 54 hours per week―from the 1920's to the 1960's, a period of significant change in household technology. In surveying two centuries of household technology in the United States, Cowan argued that the "industrialization" of the home often resulted in more work for full-time home workers because the use of such devices as coal stoves, water pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended to reduce the workload of married-women's helpers (husbands, sons, daughters, and servants) while promoting a more rigorous standard of housework. The full-time home worker's duties also shifted to include more household management, child care, and the post-Second World War phenomenon of being "Mom's taxi."
Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in highlight text?
It offers an alternative interpretation of a phenomenon described in the previous sentence .
It provides the specific evidence on which an argument described in the previous sentence is based.
It shifts the focus of the argument developed earlier in the passage.
It introduces evidence that has not been taken into account by Vanek and Cowan.
It introduces a topic for discussion that will be developed in the rest of the passage.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 C。
此句话讲的是,使用这些设备(如煤气炉、水泵和真空吸尘器)会导致家中全职妇女工人的工作量减少,但全职妇女的家务时间却可能增加。这句话主要是转移讨论的焦点,从之前有关家用电器等现代家庭技术会减少妇女的家务时间这一议题,转向有关使用这些家用设备(如煤气炉、水泵和真空吸尘器)可能会增加全职妇女的家务时间这一议题。因此,C 选项描述的最恰当。
in fact 表明是在说事实了啊 所以就已经在提供证据了啊
这题也选错,是猪啊,前面明明说but ownership of these appliances did not correlate with less time spent on housework by full-time home workers.
In fact, time spent by these workers remained remarkably constant―at about 52 to 54 hours per week―from the 1920's to the 1960's, a period of significant change in household technology.
高亮部分为前文的claim- but ownership of these appliances did not correlate with less time spent on housework by full-time home workers提供具体的数据支持
A是又提供了一个解释,那么在内容上就应该是再给出一个例子而不是说in fact然后摆数据来加强之前的论证。B是specific证据,就是给出更加详细的东西,明显是对上一个论证的展开。
感觉阅读题也需要逻辑能力和题感。