One proposal for preserving rain forests is to promote the adoption of new agricultural technologies, such as improved plant varieties and use of chemical herbicides, which would increase productivity and slow deforestation by reducing demand for new cropland. Studies have shown that farmers in developing countries who have achieved certain levels of education, wealth, and security of land tenure are more likely to adopt such technologies. But these studies have focused on villages with limited land that are tied to a market economy rather than on the relatively isolated, self-sufficient communities with ample land characteristic of rain-forest regions. A recent study of the Tawahka people of the Honduran rain forest found that farmers with some formal education were more likely to adopt improved plant varieties but less likely to use chemical herbicides and that those who spoke Spanish (the language of the market economy) were more likely to adopt both technologies. Nonland wealth was also associated with more adoption of both technologies, but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing technologies. Researchers also measured land-tenure security: in Tawahka society, kinship ties are a more important indicator of this than are legal property rights, so researchers measured it by a household's duration of residence in its village. They found that longer residence correlated with more adoption of improved plant varieties but less adoption of chemical herbicides.
The findings of the study mentioned in highlight text, if valid for rain-forest regions in general, suggest that which of the following is an obstacle most likely to be faced by those wishing to promote rain-forest preservation by implementing the proposal mentioned in line 1?
Lack of legal property rights tends to discourage local farmers from investing the time and resources required to successfully implement new agricultural technologies.
The ability to evaluate the wider economic ramifications of adopting new aricultural technologies depends on a relatively high level of formal education.
Isolation from the market economy tends to restrict local farmers' access to new agricultural technologies that could help them to increase their productivity.
Ready availability of uncultivated land tends to decrease local farmers' incentive to adopt new agricultural technologies that would reduce their need to clear new land for cultivation.
Traditions of self-sufficiency and reliance on kinship ties tend to diminish local farmers' receptivity to new agricultural technologies introduced by people from outside the local community.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
本题的正确答案是D。
从阅读材料中可以看出,这项研究表明,有一定形式的教育、财富和土地租赁安全性会增加发展中国家农民采用新农业技术的可能性,但是可用土地越多,就越不太可能采用这种技术。因此,选项D认为可用土地越多,就会减少农民采用新农业技术以减少耕地需求的激励,是正确答案。
tech = plant varieties + chemical
文章后半段分为:
1. 教育程度 ⬆️ => plant ⬆️ chemical ⬇️
2. 市场连接 ⬆️ => both ⬆️
3. 可用未开垦土地 ⬆️ => both ⬇️
4. kinship ⬆️ => plant ⬆️ chemical ⬇️
在不用想太复杂的情况下,看完题干就会想到是两个都⬇️的情况,就是D了
定位在but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing technologies.
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing tech nologies D答案是原话,E完全是自己脑补的呀
列举出原文提及的多种情况,选择most likely to be a obstacle(both diminish)的那个
定位 but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing tech nologies. Researchers also measured land-tenure security
A. kinship比property rights更加重要
B. 没有说高学历更加倾向引进新技术的原因是The ability to evaluate the wider economic ramifications
C. 并未提及isolated communities对引进新技术的影响
D. ”but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing technologies. “
E. “longer residence correlated with more adoption”,说反了
”but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing technologies. “
【转载】
tech = plant varieties + chemical
文章后半段分为:
1. 教育程度 ⬆️ => plant ⬆️ chemical ⬇️
2. 市场连接 ⬆️ => both ⬆️
3. 可用未开垦土地 ⬆️ => both ⬇️
4. kinship ⬆️ => plant ⬆️ chemical ⬇️
在不用想太复杂的情况下,看完题干就会想到是两个都⬇️的情况,就是D了
B 只是看起来有联系,但原文并没有提及evaluate the economic ramifications
c those who spoke Spanish (the language of the market economy) were more likely to adopt both technologies,但没有接触市场的也采取了variety
but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing techonologies.
只有availability of uncultivated land可以reduce,其他的句子都是介绍造成选择的不同方式的因素,选择不同的方式至少都是选择了,而不是降低选择。
还是没太明白这道题;特别是为什么不可以选市场联系
就算缺少市场联系,农民们也会采用improved plant varieties,但是line1提到的新技术包含了两种
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
看到“those who spoke Spanish (the language of the market economy) were more likely to adopt both technologies”选了C,错在自己脑部了很多过程;且选C后DE没仔细看
正确答案特征:同意替换;注意“but”后面的句子
but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing tech nologies
but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing technologies. 突然发现好像所有的选择都是从文中得来的
没有定位成功。。应该顺着study往下找答案而不是被proposal吸引回去找答案
inference的题
原句
定位but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing technologies.
需要判断哪些信息更重要,哪些信息相对不重要