Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be equally likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as the current one.
equally likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as
equally likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are
equally likely that they will exceed the proposed speed limit as
as likely that they will exceed the proposed speed limit as
as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are
题目分析:
本题的意思是:
官方预测说:司机们在新的限速标准下超速的可能性和在现行的限速标准下超速的可能性是相同的。
选项分析:
A选项:equally和as…as…均表示两者相等的含义,但是不能用equally…as…;其次,比较对象有误。在逻辑上,应该比的对象是“司机们将会有的情况”和“司机们现在的情况”,而不是和current one。
B选项:equally错误同(A)。
C选项:equally错误同(A);比较错误同(A);be likely to do为习惯表达,不能用be likely that。此处考查的是“不定式和从句的区别”。用之于本题,likely表示其身后的事情的发生的概率较高,所以应该用不定式to do。
D选项:比较错误同(A);be likely that错误同(C)。
E选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
排除ABC
D的asas中间不够平行
E如果不省略应该是 as drivers will be likely to exceed the proposed limit as drivers are likely to exceed the current limit
1.只有 as as 搭配 > 刪ABC
2.DE考的是: they are 需不需要;因為: the current one 可以 指向 drivers 或是 speed limit 所以補上they are 避免歧义 > 選E
习惯用语考察: as likely 。。。as
as likely (to do)。。。as✅
equaly likely 。。as ❌
前面有be 后面给are?
所以选了E
good登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
Drivers be as likely to exceed speeds as the current one.
分别把S和O这两个名词代入被比较对象,o: 司机超速正如(超过现在的速度), ok; S,司机超速正如现在的司机(超速),ok, 存在歧义,谓语动词必须带上。
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be equally likely to exceed the proposed speed limit and the current one.
sb equally do A and B.
您在GMATLA-SC-65这道题目中,给出了一些反馈,我已经回复完成了,您可以随时查看。若您不吝想和我交流,可以继续回复,我将不胜感激。 对于这道题,也烦请您给出具体的问题,我虽资质愚钝,但还算虚心,愿意改进自己,请不吝赐教。
你那么牛皮你考780了?
讨论具体问题,别讨论没有用的。
老师,您本不用和我一般见识。我觉得您的解析确实可以更细一点,我不喜欢迷信权威。我之前用语不文明,我向您道歉。祝您工作顺利。
这还轮不到你和我说话。无论是高考成绩还是GMAT成绩,你都至少比我低几十分,这一点我很肯定。自讨没趣。
那是,我可没你成绩好,厉害到可以说780的大神水平低。
装逼侠
实话,这解析有点钻牛角尖
你妈死了 在你考gmat的时候死的登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
那题不是it 形式主语吗,还原以后就是to give regular financial aid to their children is four times more likely for retirees in US than they are likely to receive it from them 咋比???
我记得原来有题说过as...as当中...的内容不能共用,要补出来。这道题正确选项都省了,蒙圈
这到底能不能省?我看好多题答案的选项都是asas不能省略排除出来的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论