The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but
that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously with but also
having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but
cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but also
cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but
题目分析:
本题看起来很长,但主干很简单,即,
The first trenches have yielded strong evidence.
其余部分皆是主干中某些名词的定语。选项(D)(E)中的cut into是过去分词短语,其中的非谓语动词cut的原型,分词,和过去时均同型,千万不要看错。
选项分析:
A选项:evidence的定语的部分为for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East,其核心词是societies。在逻辑上,能作为证据的肯定不是一种社会(肯定不能是“社会的证据”,只能是“社会提升的证据”,落脚点必须在动作上),而是这个社会做的一些事情。
B选项:were arising是过去进行时,整句中没有使用进行时的条件,应改为一般过去时。另外,由于整个句子的主语trenches是复数,所以谓语动词yields应该为复数以保持主谓一致。
C选项:were arising simultaneously的时态错误同选项(B)。
D选项:evidence的定语的核心词错误同(A)。主谓一致错误同选项(B)。
E选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。evidence身后的是同位语从句。
介词都有自己的意思
with,和……一起,be simultaneous with sb/sth,与某事同时发生;do sth simultaneously with sb/sth,做某事的同时,做另一事
be independent of/from sb/sth,独立于某物;do sth independently of sb/sth独立于…之外发生某动作
介词短语充当副词的补足语,一起修饰动词时,副词后面加介词,介词的选择与副词对应的形容词一致。如:
That matter will be considered [separately from the main agenda]. 那件事会与主要议程分别考虑。
整理出separately from,independently of,similarly to ,equally with, clear of、differently from / to、comparably to、identically to、consistently with、simultaneously with 等
这个整理太赞了!
棒
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
BD: yield要用复数,主语是the first trenches。
C: having done不能做定语。
A: evidence要用同位语从句表内容。
for 介短后面做定语修饰evidence,变成为了societies的evidence,所以A选项不正确
evidence后面应该接that同位语形容这个evidence的内容,所以E选项更合理
cut cut cut
trenches cut into ...have yielded evidence that societies arose simultaneously (with) but independently (of) city states.
抓核心词
本题中 evidence 的定语 核心词是什么,怎么解释合理。
arose/ simultaneously with/ but/ independently of
---v-------------adv------------------conj---------adv------------
1.主谓一致,BD错
2.平行的idiom和平行的对象,CD错
3.简洁表达,AB不好,C错
4.介词的选择,of for和that,AD不好
5.A的EAST前面的that多余。
trenches 战壕
错选A选项,因为认为E选项trenches 带了双动词所以排除。解题的关键在于要知道cut的过去式还是TM cut....所以E选项的cut可以这么写,是简化的定语从句省略了that
A. evidence后面没有带同位语从句而是接了for ...society,字面翻译是为了某某社会的证据,并不合理
B。主谓不一致,抬出去杀了
C/D simultaneously but independently of 不平行。But作为并列连词,要求前后成分平行,后面带了介词前面不带不可以(貌似前面带了后面不带可以哦...)
E. simultaneously with but independently of 平行,evidence后面是同位语从句,解释说明evidence的内容,合理
AD选项:evidence的定语的部分为for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East,其核心词是societies。在逻辑上,能作为证据的肯定不是一种社会(肯定不能是“社会的证据”,只能是“社会提升的证据”,落脚点必须在动作上),而是这个社会做的一些事情。
BCD选项:were arising是过去进行时,整句中没有使用进行时的条件,应改为一般过去时。另外,由于整个句子的主语trenches是复数,所以谓语动词yields应该为复数以保持主谓一致。
A选项:evidence的定语的部分为for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East,其核心词是societies。在逻辑上,能作为证据的肯定不是一种社会(肯定不能是“社会的证据”,只能是“社会提升的证据”,落脚点必须在动作上),而是这个社会做的一些事情。
进行时用的不对,没有标志
evidence肯定是一件事儿的证据,而不是一个东西的证据。
1.simultaneously with but independently of the。。。结构需要看出来
2.evidence肯定是一件事儿的证据,而不是一个东西的证据。
evidence肯定是一件事儿的证据,而不是一个东西的证据。A的evidence修饰的其实是societies,不成立,应该是societies arise。
简单题错了
考查:
前中:主谓一致:The first trenches have yielded,排除bd
c having been cut 错误
后:此时,对比ae,发现重要的区别是evidence that和evidence for的区别,选e,因为a中evidence for societies,社会的证据,错误,错误,一般后面长复杂结构就直接接that从句
注意全面注意前中后的考点,一定不要错简单题
时态,单复数,but also,平行省略等
B,D因为yields单复数不对,排除
A;that were cut & that were arising 做修饰太wordy了
C:having been cut太wordy了,后半句有have和were两个谓语,结构杂糅
请问:with but also这个用法没有问题吗?but also是不是要求前面必须出现not only,一起组成not only……but also……的固定搭配?
靠这样的点很难排除的。and尚且可以表示转折,but的用法也有很多,这是百度文库里讲的:https://wenku.baidu.com/view/4da2232658fb770bf78a55ea.html
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
看清是of。。。
注意什么时候用进行时
注意平行是和谁平行