The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but
that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously with but also
having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but
cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but also
cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but
题目分析:
本题看起来很长,但主干很简单,即,
The first trenches have yielded strong evidence.
其余部分皆是主干中某些名词的定语。选项(D)(E)中的cut into是过去分词短语,其中的非谓语动词cut的原型,分词,和过去时均同型,千万不要看错。
选项分析:
A选项:evidence的定语的部分为for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East,其核心词是societies。在逻辑上,能作为证据的肯定不是一种社会(肯定不能是“社会的证据”,只能是“社会提升的证据”,落脚点必须在动作上),而是这个社会做的一些事情。
B选项:were arising是过去进行时,整句中没有使用进行时的条件,应改为一般过去时。另外,由于整个句子的主语trenches是复数,所以谓语动词yields应该为复数以保持主谓一致。
C选项:were arising simultaneously的时态错误同选项(B)。
D选项:evidence的定语的核心词错误同(A)。主谓一致错误同选项(B)。
E选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。evidence身后的是同位语从句。
本来选成了B,但是ab的时态不对
AB选项的过去进行时表达不对,
D选项同时主谓一致上,yields和trenches 不对等
C选项,having been cut 时态不对。
A里面for不对的原因是不是应该是,for通常表示目的,而这里是需要进一步阐释evidence的内容,所以应该用that从句呢?
arise simultaneously with but independently of 中 but前后平行
relative judgements:
ABC:(that were/having been) cut VS cut
核心词变换,arise的用法
选项(D)(E)中的cut into是过去分词短语,其中的非谓语动词cut的原型,分词,和过去时均同型,千万不要看错。
错选A。没找到arose的真正修饰对象
A中.1.evidence for is not correct
2.that were arising doesn‘t clearly modify complex societies
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/the-first-trenches-t7576.html
evidence的定语的部分为for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East,其核心词是societies。在逻辑上,能作为证据的肯定不是一种社会(肯定不能是“社会的证据”,只能是“社会提升的证据”,落脚点必须在动作上),而是这个社会做的一些事情。
arise是vi,没有被动,ABC排除,D末尾but also前面没有not only所以pass,yields也pass
主谓很远的时候应当想到很有可能出 主谓一致 的问题《==优先于时态考虑
不同副词带来不同的介词需求,要平行放置,很美:arose simultaneously with but independently of
simultaneously with 和 independently of 为平行关系
A选项:'that were cut...' and 'that were arising...' are unnecessarily wordy and creating confusing sentence structure.
B选项:yields不符合主谓一致(the first trenches);
C选项:'having been cut...' is wordy; 'arising simultaneously' 要后跟with才可以;
D选项:yields不符合主谓一致;also 无意义;
cut是分词不是动词原形,mark
因为英语时态本身的模糊性,所以时态不能算作成分差异,要放到最后拉排除。由主干成分的主谓不一致排除BD,核心词错误排除A;CE比较,having been在这里表示先时性,没什么问题,C中的过去进行时不太对,所以选E
B trenches复数 不能用yields
C having been cut错误不能修饰 trenches
E 正确 simultaneously with和 independently of 平行
societies arose simultaneously with but independently of city-states
cut的原型,分词,和过去时均同型!!
不知道这样理解行不行?求大神指教:Trenches壕沟,cut into打断,在这里没有被动语态词by,逻辑上讲,应该是壕沟围出了一个500英亩的地块,而不是壕沟被一个500英亩的地块阻断,排除A,B,C。
D,yields的主语为trenches,主谓不一致,排除。
这个解答碉堡!!!赞!!!
DE中过去分词作定语也是表示被动的
DE里的cut也是被动啊
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
错选A项,evidence的定语的核心词判断错误
A中that were arising可以修饰regions 有歧义
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论