Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
Ferber's syndrome, a viral disease that frequently affects cattle, is transmitted to these animals through infected feed. Even though chickens commercially raised for meat are often fed the type of feed identified as the source of infection in cattle, Ferber's syndrome is only rarely observed in chickens. This fact, however, does not indicate that most chickens are immune to the virus that causes Ferber's syndrome, since _____.
chickens and cattle are not the only kinds of farm animal that are typically fed the type of feed liable to be contaminated with the virus that causes Ferber's syndrome
Ferber's syndrome has been found in animals that have not been fed the type of feed liable to be contaminated with the virus that can cause the disease
resistance to some infectious organisms such as the virus that causes Ferber's syndrome can be acquired by exposure to a closely related infectious organism
chickens and cattle take more than a year to show symptoms of Ferber's syndrome, and chickens commercially raised for meat, unlike cattle, are generally brought to market during the first year of life
the type of feed liable to be infected with the virus that causes Ferber's syndrome generally constitutes a larger proportion of the diet of commercially raised chickens than of commercially raised cattle
情景:常发生在牛身上的Ferber综合症是通过被感染食物传播的。虽然肉鸡也被喂这种被感染食物,但Ferber综合症在肉鸡中很少被观察到。但是,这并不能说明肉鸡对Ferber病毒有免疫。
推理:本题是一个“现象解释型考题”。按照正常逻辑来说,即,结论应该为“肉鸡对Ferber病毒有免疫”。由于前提和结论描述的是不同的事件,且结论为因,所以本题是果因推理。
顺序的因果逻辑:因为肉鸡对Ferber病毒有免疫,所以Ferber综合症在肉鸡中很少被观察到
(果)前提:Ferber综合症在肉鸡中很少被观察到
(因)结论:肉鸡对Ferber病毒有免疫
选题方式:果因推理有两个评估方向,简而言之,即,答案选项中要么给出产生“Ferber综合症在肉鸡中很少被观察到”的另外一个原因,要么讨论“肉鸡对Ferber病毒有免疫”与“Ferber综合症在肉鸡中很少被观察到”之间的关系。
选项分析:
讨论对象是鸡和牛,吃一样的东西为什么鸡不得病,说明问题出现在鸡和牛不同的地方。其它选项都因为无关被排除了。E有点迷惑,都说了吃的同一种饲料了。
病毒来源一样 不是说饲料一样
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
这道题我用了类比,前提是鸡牛都是一种食物; 结论是鸡也容易得病。问削弱,答案是鸡不到一年就被宰了,和牛不一样,属于CQ1: 相似性问题,说出鸡和牛的不同之处。
感觉很完美
所以是不是每道题并不是只适用于一种逻辑?只要能说得通就行了?
这题在本质上是类比,但由于不好理解,所以这里统一写为果因推理。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
用类比蒙对了,不过回看发现显然不能类比,类比只能论证鸡是不是和牛一样被传染,而不能论证到被传染而时间太短没法观察出来这个层面
类比是不是也可以
其实是可以的~因为这个果因的本质是在类比两者,只不过这有点深层次了,用果因比较好理解。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
同样觉得是类比 不过相关因果貌似也有道理
感觉用类比也能做。
果因哦,哎。
应该是果因。
为什么不是相关因果推理?
不是相关因果吧。。