扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2016-SC-62
Laos has a land area about the same as Great Britain but only four million in population, where many are members of hill tribes ensconced in the virtually inaccessible mountain valleys of the north.
about the same as Great Britain but only four million in population, where many
of about the same size as Great Britain is, but in Laos there is a population of only four million, and many
that is about the same size as Great Britain's land area, but in Laos with a population of only four million people, many of them
comparable to the size of Great Britain, but only four million in population, and many
comparable to that of Great Britain but a population of only four million people, many of whom
题目分析：
略
选项分析：
A选项：比较对象不正确，应该比较的是英国的面积而不是英国本身，即，应改为：
Laos has a land area about the same as that of Great Britain.
另外，population不应该用where修饰。where引导的定语从句只能修饰地点名词。
B选项：本选项中Laos是there is a population of only four million的地点状语。其描述的是“在老挝里，这仅有400w人口”，这是不合逻辑的，例如：
(1) 在中国，这有一辆车。（In China, there is a car.）
(2) 中国有一辆车。（China has a car）
两个例句的意思是完全不同的。句(1)中，我们无法确定这辆车是否属于中国所有，例如这辆车的主人是个美国人，他把车放在了中国境内，但你不能说，这辆车就是中国的。用之于本题，显然地，一定是“老挝自己仅仅拥有400w人口”。
另外，“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”不应该是并且（and）关系，而应该是主次关系。因为，人口分布情况是在介绍老挝人口情况的。（依图形背景原则）
C选项：Laos不是拥有population of only four million的主语错误同(B)。
D选项：“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”并列错误同(B)。
E选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
我觉得C 可以这样理解： 前一句说的是老挝有多大的土地，后一句说的是他们中的许多人是分部在山上的。前后不构成转折关系
那个in Laos 真的太难理解啦TAT 考场上本渣肯定想不出来。。
the "but" creates parallelism between the 2 nouns describing things that laos has.
with choice (e), the sentence reads as follows:
laos has a land area comparable to that of Great Britain but a population of only 4 million people, many of whom...
并列连词可以省略相同的主谓
——句意——
1）比较错误
A：Laos has a land area about the same as 【Great Britain】❌
2）并列错误
B：Laos has a land area of about the same size as Great Britain is, but 【in Laos there is a population of only four million】, and 【many are members of hill tribes ensconced in the virtually inaccessible mountain valleys of the north】 ❌ and并列的很不合理
D：but 【only four million in population】, and 【many are members of hill tribes ensconced in the virtually inaccessible mountain valleys of the north】❌
3）主语缺失
C：Laos has a land area that is about the same size as Great Britain's land area, but 【in Laos with a population of only four million people, many of them are members of hill tribes ensconced in the virtually inaccessible mountain valleys of the north】❌没有主语后半句
4）正确转折
E：Laos 【has a land area comparable to that of Great Britain】 but【(has) a population of only four million people】, many of whom are members of hill tribes ensconced in the virtually inaccessible mountain valleys of the north.✔
C 整个结构不如E平行
Laos has a land area XXX but a population XXX
a land area that is about the same size as Great Britain's land area 这句话不对
you can say that two AREAS are the SAME.
you can also say that two pieces of LAND (or two COUNTRIES) have the same SIZE.
it's incorrect to say that two AREAS have the same SIZE.
考察了平行和比较结构，已经定语从句的修饰
A：比较结构a land area is the same as GB is，地和国不能比
且where不能修饰population
B：比较结构 a land area is of about same size as GB is，还是地和国比，虽然比的是面积勉强可以
but和and的使用变更了原句的意思；many指代不清
C：比较结构a land area is about same size as GB is，还是地和国比，虽然比的是面积勉强可以
but后核心词变为many of them如何如何，不构成转折关系
且many of them不同于many of whom，不能作为从句，导致成分残缺
D：比较结构a land area is comparable to size of GB，地和面积比
and many与前句割裂，
E：正确
(A)(C)as表類比不加N(會和表身分搞混)
(B)as Great Britain "has"才對;且there be不好
(D)many不如many of whom准确地指代到four million people
Laos has a land area ....but (has) a population ....but是做has后的名词并列连接词
一是and 前后逻辑上（图形背景原则，是否有包含修饰关系等等）是否并列，二是比较对象要一致，三是there be只表示状态，不包含从属关系
B选项：本选项中Laos是there is a population of only four million的地点状语。其描述的是“在老挝里，这仅有400w人口”，这是不合逻辑的，例如：
(1) 在中国，这有一辆车。（In China, there is a car.）
(2) 中国有一辆车。（China has a car）
两个例句的意思是完全不同的。句(1)中，我们无法确定这辆车是否属于中国所有，例如这辆车的主人是个美国人，他把车放在了中国境内，但你不能说，这辆车就是中国的。用之于本题，显然地，一定是“老挝自己仅仅拥有400w人口”。
另外，“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”不应该是并且（and）关系，而应该是主次关系。因为，人口分布情况是在介绍老挝人口情况的。
B选项：本选项中Laos是there is a population of only four million的地点状语。其描述的是“在老挝里，这仅有400w人口”，这是不合逻辑的，例如：
(1) 在中国，这有一辆车。（In China, there is a car.）
(2) 中国有一辆车。（China has a car）
两个例句的意思是完全不同的。句(1)中，我们无法确定这辆车是否属于中国所有，例如这辆车的主人是个美国人，他把车放在了中国境内，但你不能说，这辆车就是中国的。用之于本题，显然地，一定是“老挝自己仅仅拥有400w人口”。
另外，“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”不应该是并且（and）关系，而应该是主次关系。因为，人口分布情况是在介绍老挝人口情况的。
“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”不应该是并且（and）关系，而应该是主次关系。因为，人口分布情况是在介绍老挝人口情况的。
比较对象排除A
In LAOS排除BCD，记住这种情况，某国拥有人口就是国家has
in Laos there is 错
laos has a land area but a population，。。。。
B“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”不应该是并且（and）关系，而应该是主次关系。因为，人口分布情况是在介绍老挝人口情况的。（依图形背景原则）
the "but" creates parallelism between the 2 nouns describing things that laos has.
with choice (e), the sentence reads as follows:
laos has a land area comparable to that of Great Britain but a population of only 4 million people, many of whom...
Laos has X but Y, X 和 Y都是noun， 然后 many of whom是对Y的modifier。
by contrast, if the sentence had contained "many of them", then it would be a run-on.
so:
*i adopted two dogs, they weigh approximately 100 pounds each
is a run-on sentence (--> incorrect). for the same reason,
*i adopted two dogs, each of them weighs approximately 100 pounds
and
*... a population of only 4 million people, many of them are members of hill tribes...
would also be run-on sentences (--> incorrect).
Laos has a land area 陆地面积，comparable to that of Great Britain