扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / OG2016-SC-62
Laos has a land area about the same as Great Britain but only four million in population, where many are members of hill tribes ensconced in the virtually inaccessible mountain valleys of the north.
about the same as Great Britain but only four million in population, where many
of about the same size as Great Britain is, but in Laos there is a population of only four million, and many
that is about the same size as Great Britain's land area, but in Laos with a population of only four million people, many of them
comparable to the size of Great Britain, but only four million in population, and many
comparable to that of Great Britain but a population of only four million people, many of whom
题目分析：
略
选项分析：
A选项：比较对象不正确，应该比较的是英国的面积而不是英国本身，即，应改为：
Laos has a land area about the same as that of Great Britain.
另外，population不应该用where修饰。where引导的定语从句只能修饰地点名词。
B选项：本选项中Laos是there is a population of only four million的地点状语。其描述的是“在老挝里，这仅有400w人口”，这是不合逻辑的，例如：
(1) 在中国，这有一辆车。（In China, there is a car.）
(2) 中国有一辆车。（China has a car）
两个例句的意思是完全不同的。句(1)中，我们无法确定这辆车是否属于中国所有，例如这辆车的主人是个美国人，他把车放在了中国境内，但你不能说，这辆车就是中国的。用之于本题，显然地，一定是“老挝自己仅仅拥有400w人口”。
另外，“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”不应该是并且（and）关系，而应该是主次关系。因为，人口分布情况是在介绍老挝人口情况的。（依图形背景原则）
C选项：Laos不是拥有population of only four million的主语错误同(B)。
D选项：“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”并列错误同(B)。
E选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
D选项的解释应该有误，这里and不一定错，可以是表示前一句的延伸，刚好接上解释population。
连词前后带（省略）句子
A:have 一个数字 in population，奇怪
B:where可以引导定语从句、状语从句，in Laos there is a population, Laus应该是有这么多人口，而不是有人口这件事的地点
E 选项里的that 不是相当于指代了老挝里的land area吗？？？
that和those可以做部分指代，it/they才是完全指代
谢谢
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
relative judegements:
BC：same size as GB is / same size as GB’s land area VS same size as GB
B: 前面是不是要改成 Great Britain has?
加一
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
主句应该是两个国家领土面积相等，但人数差别很大。
其次人口分布情况应该是进一步解释说明，所以放进从句。这样更符合逻辑
c选项 them不能指代people吗
It is true that the relative pronoun modifier “who” is used for the doer of an action, and “whom” is used for the receiver of an action. However, the correct answer choice of the said official question does not only use “whom”. It uses the phrases “many of whom”.
In fact, the word “many” in the phrase “many of whom” is the doer of the action. The word “whom” has been used to refer to “4 million people”.
population不应该用where修饰。where引导的定语从句只能修饰地点名词。
Laos是there is a population of only four million的地点状语。其描述的是“在老挝里，这仅有400w人口”，这是不合逻辑的
“老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”不应该是并且（and）关系，而应该是主次关系。因为，人口分布情况是在介绍老挝人口情况的。（依图形背景原则）
but前后要平行，就剩下e可选了
A比较对象
B不能in laos,有人口，而应该是Laos have population.有人口和人口分布是主次关系不能是并列关系
C的in laos with...表达awkawrd
D有人口和人口分布并列，应为主次关系
对于C选项，专有名词或独一无二的名词“老挝“，不可以再加限定性修饰了。emmmm林，给出的解释合理！
A选项：where不能引导population的定语；
B选项：比较对象不对等：size 和 great Britain；'there is...'wordy;
C选项：them指代不清晰，表达很awkward;
D选项：老挝有多少人口”和“这些人口的分布情况”并列错误同(B)
BCE类似考察：
This model explains all known subatomic particles, SOME OF WHICH WERE only recently discovered.
This model explains all known subatomic particles, SOME OF THEM only recently discovered.
This model explains all known subatomic particles, SOME only recently discovered.
B同理于第三小句，但many身前and多余，另起一句使得many句意模糊。
我觉得 就是搞清楚原句每个部分的作用就很好做呀 最后的many of whom 那一块的内容就是在修饰population的呀
老师，我这道题做10遍错10遍，到底是生命中缺了什么o(╥﹏╥)o
请问bcd的比较都正确吗？
A：前面比较对象不对，后面population的定语引导词有误；
B：there be句型，考虑与has的语意区别，判断逻辑上的修饰对象；
C: Laos with population of only 4 million people
Here, the with-modifier in red implies that there is MORE THAN ONE Laos and that the sentence is referring to ONE SPECIFIC Laos:
Laos WITH A POPULATION OF ONLY 4 MILLION PEOPLE.
This meaning is nonsensical.
There is not more than Laos.
可参考：https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/gmat-prep-verbal-f31.html
C: Laos with population of only 4 million people
Here, the with-modifier in red implies that there is MORE THAN ONE Laos -- Laos with a population of only 1 million people, Laos with a population of only 2 million people, Laos with a population of only 3 million people -- and that the sentence is referring to ONE SPECIFIC Laos:
Laos WITH A POPULATION OF ONLY 4 MILLION PEOPLE.
This meaning is nonsensical.
There is not more than Laos.
Eliminate C.