The results of the company's cost-cutting measures are evident in its profits, which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell over the last two years.
which increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it fell
which had increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it had fallen
which have increased five percent during the first three months of this year after falling
with a five percent increase during the first three months of this year after falling
with a five percent increase during the first three months of this year after having fallen
题目分析:
略。
选项分析:
A选项:划线部分的代词it应该同未划线部分出现的its指代对象相同,即,the company,但是,在逻辑上,在过去两年内下降的应该是公司的利润(its profits)而不是公司本身(the company)。
B选项:时态有误,had increased是过去完成时,过去完成时必须存在于有明确的过去时间点作为参照的语境中,即,表示过去的过去,本句中由于没有明确的过去时间作为参照,所以此处不能用过去完成时;it错误同(A)。
C选项:Correct. 本选项在语法上和逻辑上均是正确的。
D选项:本选项中的介词短语with a five percent increase是状语(用逗号和主句隔开的介词短语通常都是状语)。顾名思义,状语是用来修饰动词的特性或特征的。在逻辑上,“增长了5%”描述的是profit的特点,而不是be evident的特征,由于profits是名词,所以“增长了5%”必须做profits的定语。
E选项:本选项错误同(D)。
没有去找硬错误,一直找软错误然后选择,选错了
ab错误都是it指代问题,前面its已经指代了不同的主语
A:句子中同一个代词需要指代同一个对象;
B:同A,it指代对象不合理
C:连词+doing伴随主语,其主语和修饰对象的主语一样
DE:逗号+with作为状语,during是介词;
名词描述名词特征,在这里讲的是利润特征;状语修饰谓语,增长不是be evident的特征
Ron:in general, \"COMMA + prep phrase modifier\" is an adverbial modifier, meaning that it modifies the entirety of the preceding clause.
in this sentence, we don\'t want an adverbial modifier, since it doesn\'t make any sense for this modifier to apply to the entire preceding claus
with 去修饰通常是表伴随,但是题目中很明显是在进一步解释,所以which...要远远优于with...
注意AB选项中it的指代问题 profits 是副词
"after having VERBed" is, in general, a redundant construction -- the word "after" is already there, so "having" doesn't contribute anything.
if you see this construction, you should generally be able to replace it with "after VERBing". it's possible that there are exceptions, but i can't think of any at this time.
profits复数 AB 指代错误。B两个过去完成时,没有时间标志
老师,C选项中,falling是什么时态呢,after falling是状语从句吗?修饰的是谁呢?
连词after+现在分词都是伴随状语,是简化状语从句。分词本身是没有时态的,现在分词只是表示主动而已。状语也是修饰语,有就近修饰的原则,选项C中就是修饰increae的咯~
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
DE用with作状语修饰measures are evident是说得通的,问题是falling/having fallen没有主语,which就解决了这个问题
同意
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
"after" isn't a parallel signal. it can introduce another verb, but it doesn't have to; it can also be followed by -ING, or even by a noun, in these cases.
i came home after i finished printing the report
i came home after working out
i came home after midnight
... all correct
为什么可以用falling?
D 是否也可理解为独立主格? 修饰主句主语
after falling还是看成一个简单的状语比较好
d的with作状语修饰最近句子的动作,after falling需要修饰一个紧接着的动作,或者看成是伴随,逻辑主语应该是profits,都讲不通
"after" isn't a parallel signal. it can introduce another verb, but it doesn't have to; it can also be followed by -ING, or even by a noun, in these cases.
i came home after i finished printing the report
i came home after working out
i came home after midnight
... all correct
"after __ing" should describe something that happens pretty much right on the heels of "__ing" (i.e., there should not be a long interim between the action/event represented by "__ing" and that represented by the verb).
此题考点是时态的掌握,在今年的前三个月这个提示下,应该意识到用have done,而不是过去式和过去完成,after 后面跟v-ing是对的,主语是profit,所以可以主动falling。
这题要我命了。。。看到后面over the last two years 觉得是题目给的时间提示,要用现在完成时 所以就选了E。。。。请问为啥这题最后完全不考虑时态了呢
状语是用来修饰动词的特性或特征的
这个解释有问题,首先状语就不一定是修饰动词的,举个例子,I read the book on the table. "on the table"是状语吧?它修饰read吗?显然修饰的是book。看RON说,当with前面有comma的时候,
A. 它可以修饰preceding clause 此时的作用相当于V+ ing
B. 也可以修饰preceding main noun 此时作用相当于which
具体修饰什么,完全是看context。
这道题我觉得with的修饰从语法上来说没有问题,只是which更好,因为which只能修饰profits,一点歧义都不会造成,非常严谨。而with既然都可以,那么读者就会思考一下with后面的内容是修饰哪个部分,因此从表达的严谨上来看,which更好。
恩恩 说的很对 谢谢~~
对了 此题的with是有问题的 因为with引导的状语,与主句主语相同,The results increased five percent意思就不对了
在语法上,comma+with可以修饰它前面的那个名词,也就是profits。with引导的独立主格结构,可以修饰前面分句,谓语动词,主语,以及它紧跟的名词,修饰紧跟的名词时,相当于which。既然修饰紧跟的名词,为什么逻辑主语是前面分句的主语results?而且独立主格结构有自己的主语,它只是跟前一句中的某个部分或者整句有逻辑关系而已。
I read the book on the table,我觉得这里的on the table 是做定语修饰book的,不是状语。如果做状语的话应该要用逗号隔开
是的,我之前说的有些问题。这里 on the table是作后置定语。
嗯嗯
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
a c 怎么比较