One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking," permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets.
问题问的是:有一种做法是benchmark和自己没有竞争的公司,为这样的比较找个理由,下面的理由哪个是不成立的
E中说成功是由于take advantage of special circumstances,如果是这样的话,应该是找竞争者比较会更合理,因为只有自己的竞争者会面临和自己相同的“special circumstance”
补充的超棒!
谢谢,你的解释比较合理。评论应该有个置顶功能
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论