Historians remain divided over the role of banks in facilitating economic growth in the United States in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Some scholars contend that banks played a minor role in the nation's growing economy. Financial institutions, they argue, appeared only after the economy had begun to develop, and once organized, followed conservative lending practices, providing aid to established commercial enterprises but shunning those, such as manufacturing and transportation projects, that were more uncertain and capital-intensive (i.e., requiring greater expenditures in the form of capital than in labor).
A growing number of historians argue, in contrast, that banks were crucial in transforming the early national economy. When state legislatures began granting more bank charters in the 1790s and early 1800s, the supply of credit rose accordingly. Unlike the earliest banks, which had primarily provided short-term loans to well-connected merchants, the banks of the early nineteenth century issued credit widely. As Paul Gilje asserts, the expansion and democratization of credit in the early nineteenth century became the driving force of the American economy, as banks began furnishing large amounts of capital to transportation and industrial enterprises. The exception, such historians argue, was in the South; here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.
Which of the following statements best describes the function of the last sentence of the passage?
It provides evidence tending to undermine the viewpoint of the scholars mentioned in the highlighted text.
It resolves a conflict over the role of banks summarized in the first paragraph.
It clarifies some of the reasons state legislatures began granting more bank charters.
It qualifies a claim made earlier in the passage about the impact of banks on the American economy in the early nineteenth century.
It supports a claim made earlier in the passage about how the expansion of credit affected the economy.
题目分析:
文章推断题:文章最后一句话的作用是?
文章最后一句话讲了一个例外——南方的情况,并没有像其他地区一样,促进经济发展,说明第二段的观点有不适用的地方
选项分析:
A选项:为了削弱高亮的学者的观点:与第一段无关。
B选项:解决了两种观点的冲突之处:文章并没有解决此冲突
C选项:阐述了立法者开始发放银行执照的原因:无关
D选项:它对第二段的结论进行了限定,正确。
E选项:支持之前关于“信贷的扩张如何影响经济”的观点:南方的情况只是作为一种补充说明,使此论点更精确
qualify限定
It qualifies a claim made earlier in the passage about the impact of banks on the American economy in the early nineteenth century. 最后一句话增加了一个exception, 就是给结论予以限定。
Qualify 限定
qualify:限定
D选项:它对第二段的结论进行了限定,正确。
qualify a claim, 对.....提出限定,对第二段结论银行的影响提出限定
rc
qualify限定,给。。做限制
It qualifies a claim made earlier in the passage about the impact of banks on the American economy in the early nineteenth century.
qualifies a claim, 意思是提出限定,做错事因为没看懂这个短语
qualify对应exception!
qualify对应exception
没有读到d选项就选了A, 应该是d更加合适。
与第一段的关系是限定结论范围,提高结论质量。而不是削弱a。
觉得“qualify”是第二段的historians指出了他们自己观点的exception,让他们这方的观点更加准确完善
题目中的“a claim made earlier”指的是什么呢
qualify词义理解错误,表示限制限定,在这里对应原文中的exception
qualify对应exception!好绝
在D和E之间纠结,问题出在对qualify a claim的理解,以及没有太关注exception这个词,很关键。
需要注意提问句子中的关键考点。
A选项:最后一句话描述的是银行对经济发展有利的一个例外事件,第二段的描述有关,对第一段没关系;
B选项:这种关于两张观点的冲突没有被resolved
C选项:没提到,也推到不出来
D选项:’The exception‘使这个观点成为历史学家的第二点观点的一个“例外” 这里qualify是限定,描述的意思
E选项:not support, but rather serve as an exception to that claim
qualify词义理解错误,表示限制限定,在这里对应原文中的exception
If you qualify a statement, you make it less strong or less general by adding a detail or explanation to it. (通过增加细节、解释) 使语气缓和; 使…不太笼统
错选B;答案D;
B. It resolves a conflict over the role of banks summarized in the first paragraph. 这个事例存在也无法调和两种观点的矛盾。
D. qualify的用来修饰、限定,也就是说最后一句话进一步限定了、缩小了银行对经济起促进作用的范围,不包括南方。体会最后一句话提出了一个例外,这个例外,更准确限定了前面内容的范围。
Qualify对应 exception!!!
qualify 意思是 make more specific 具体说明;使语气缓和 想了很久错选C 脑补反垄断就要 granting more bank charters