Historians remain divided over the role of banks in facilitating economic growth in the United States in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Some scholars contend that banks played a minor role in the nation's growing economy. Financial institutions, they argue, appeared only after the economy had begun to develop, and once organized, followed conservative lending practices, providing aid to established commercial enterprises but shunning those, such as manufacturing and transportation projects, that were more uncertain and capital-intensive (i.e., requiring greater expenditures in the form of capital than in labor).
A growing number of historians argue, in contrast, that banks were crucial in transforming the early national economy. When state legislatures began granting more bank charters in the 1790s and early 1800s, the supply of credit rose accordingly. Unlike the earliest banks, which had primarily provided short-term loans to well-connected merchants, the banks of the early nineteenth century issued credit widely. As Paul Gilje asserts, the expansion and democratization of credit in the early nineteenth century became the driving force of the American economy, as banks began furnishing large amounts of capital to transportation and industrial enterprises. The exception, such historians argue, was in the South; here, the overwhelmingly agrarian nature of the economy generated outright opposition to banks, which were seen as monopolistic institutions controlled by an elite group of planters.
Which of the following statements best describes the function of the last sentence of the passage?
It provides evidence tending to undermine the viewpoint of the scholars mentioned in the highlighted text.
It resolves a conflict over the role of banks summarized in the first paragraph.
It clarifies some of the reasons state legislatures began granting more bank charters.
It qualifies a claim made earlier in the passage about the impact of banks on the American economy in the early nineteenth century.
It supports a claim made earlier in the passage about how the expansion of credit affected the economy.
题目分析:
文章推断题:文章最后一句话的作用是?
文章最后一句话讲了一个例外——南方的情况,并没有像其他地区一样,促进经济发展,说明第二段的观点有不适用的地方
选项分析:
A选项:为了削弱高亮的学者的观点:与第一段无关。
B选项:解决了两种观点的冲突之处:文章并没有解决此冲突
C选项:阐述了立法者开始发放银行执照的原因:无关
D选项:它对第二段的结论进行了限定,正确。
E选项:支持之前关于“信贷的扩张如何影响经济”的观点:南方的情况只是作为一种补充说明,使此论点更精确
最后一段:银行放贷促进经济,也给生产和运输的工厂放贷。除了一个例外:南部有垄断。
Abanks played a minor role in the nation’s growing economy. 有垄断并不能否认促进经济的事实,所以还是加强
qualify在这里是限定的意思。第二段是18世纪末19世纪初,银行信用扩张对经济的正面作用,最后一句是反例,是指出上述论调的局限性
qualify 的意思: be entitled to a particular benefit or privilege by fulfilling a necessary condition。译为“够资格”更适合一些。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
qualify限定,修饰。句尾给出了一个例外修饰了其范围。
错选B;答案D;
B. It resolves a conflict over the role of banks summarized in the first paragraph. 这个事例存在也无法调和两种观点的矛盾。
D. qualify的用来修饰、限定,也就是说最后一句话进一步限定了、缩小了银行对经济起促进作用的范围,不包括南方。体会最后一句话提出了一个例外,这个例外,更准确限定了前面内容的范围。