Conodonts, the spiky phosphatic remains(bones and teeth composed of calcium phosphate) of tiny marine animals that probably appeared about 520 million years ago, were once among the most controversial of fossils. Both the nature of the organism to which the remains belonged and the function of the remains were unknown. However, since the 1981 discovery of fossils preserving not just the phosphatic elements but also other remains of the tiny soft-bodied animals (also called conodonts) that bore them,scientists' reconstructions of the animals' anatomy have had important implications for hypotheses concerning the development of the vertebrate skeleton.
The vertebrate skeleton had traditionally been regarded as a defensive development, champions of this view postulating that it was only with the much later evolution of jaws that vertebrates became predators. The first vertebrates, which were soft-bodied, would have been easy prey for numerous invertebrate carnivores, especially if these early vertebrates were sedentary suspension feeders. Thus, traditionalists argued,these animals developed coverings of bony scales or plates, and teeth were secondary features, adapted from the protective bony scales. Indeed, external skeletons of this type are common among the well-known fossils of ostracoderms, jawless vertebrates that existed from approximately 500 to 400 million years ago. However, other paleontologists argued that many of the definitive characteristics of vertebrates, such as paired eyes and muscular and skeletal adaptations for active life, would not have evolved unless the first vertebrates were predatory. Teeth were more primitive than external armor according to this view, and the earliest vertebrates were predators.
The stiffening not ochord along the back of the body, V-shaped muscle blocks along the sides, and posterior tail fins help to identify conodonts as among the most primitive of vertebrates. The lack of any mineralized structures apart from the elements in the mouth indicates that conodonts were more primitive than the armored jawless fishes such as the ostracoderms. It now appears that the hard parts that first evolved in the mouth of an animal improved its efficiency as a predator, and that aggression rather than protection was the driving force behind the origin of the vertebrate skeleton.
The second paragraph in the passage serves primarily to
outline the significance of the 1981 discovery of conodont remains to the debate concerning the development of the vertebrate skeleton
contrast the traditional view of the development of the vertebrate skeleton with a view derived from the 1981 discovery of conodont remains
contrast the characteristics of the ostracoderms with the characteristics of earlier soft-bodied vertebrates
explain the importance of the development of teeth among the earliest vertebrate predators
present the two sides of the debate concerning the development of the vertebrate skeleton
题目分析:
文章推断题:第二段的作用是?
选项分析:
A选项:列出1981的discovery对讨论脊椎动物骨骼发展的重要性:第二段具体讨论了脊椎动物到底是不是predator,没有提1981 discovery的重要性。
B选项:对比“关于脊椎动物发展的传统看法”和“从1981发现得出的观点”:文章没有对比传统观点和新发现。
C选项:对比O的特点和早期软骨脊椎动物的特点:文章没有对比他们的特点,文章提到O,使得早期观点看起来有问题。
D选项:解释早期有脊椎的捕食者的牙齿的重要性:文章没有提。
E选项:正确。提出一个辩论的两方,这个辩论讨论了脊椎动物骨骼的发展:第二段前半部分认为脊椎动物不是predator,后半部分提出认为是predator的观点。
选项B最tricky的地方在于contrast the traditional view with a view derived from the 1981 discovery of conodont remains
第二个view本身并不是从1981年的发现中得到的。而是和传统观点一样,在化石发现之前就已经存在了。只是化石的发现解决了两派意见的争端
第一段讲研究conodonts的意义,
第二段讲关于vertebrate起源到底是先发展出坚硬的外骨骼还是坚硬的下巴的两种观点,
第三段讲conodonts的研究帮助证明是先有坚硬的下巴,后有外骨骼
AB选项:两种观点一直存在,只是1981年的研究发现证明了第二种是对的,故错误
第二段的结构:先说traditionalists 的观点,然后however, other paleontologists argued 反驳了传统观点,所用的依据是definitive characteristics of vertebrates, such as paired eyes and muscular and skeletal adaptations for active life,但这些还都不是1981的discovery indicates的部分
第三段引入了discovery证实了后者的观点是对的
文中关键词 :
第一段:controversial:说明接下来极有可能会有两方观点的对比;however, hypotheses:有了新发现,提出了新假设
第二段:traditionally,indeed陈述第一个观点;however通过转折陈述反方观点
第三段:more primitive 第二个观点核心结论与第一个观点不同的地方
同时,第二段并没有偏重哪个观点,认为第二种观点驳倒第一种的,是第三段提供的内容
sian 9个月前
第二段中间有个However, 可知是观点的对比。从BE里面选,(当时脑子一抽看到P2开头写traditional以为就是新旧观点对比,看到B的关键字contrast, traditional就选了B)。事实上P1最后一句scientists' reconstructions of the animals' anatomy have had important implications for hypotheses concerning the development of the vertebrate skeleton. 【 hypotheses】就是P2提到的两种观点。全文的逻辑就是p1 的 discovery,p2两种观点,p1的discovery支持了观点2。 从来没有说是新旧对比!而是横向对比!
B错在后半句,不是【derived from 】1981,而是1981年的discovery证明了观点2,注意contrast是干扰词
赞!顶一个
顶你的解释,棒!
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
B错在后半句,不是derived from 1981,而是1981年的discovery证明了观点2,注意contrast是干扰词
b:contrast the traditional view of the development of the vertebrate skeleton with a view derived from the 1981 discovery of conodont remains 第一,a view derived from the 1981 discovery of conodont remains 错,这个观点一直存在,只是后面1981这发现加强了他,所以不是 derived from ,第二:这一段根本没有提到 1981 discovery 这个东东,出现在第三段。。。
第二段中间有个However, 可知是观点的对比。从BE里面选,(当时脑子一抽看到P2开头写traditional以为就是新旧观点对比,看到B的关键字contrast, traditional就选了B)。事实上P1最后一句scientists' reconstructions of the animals' anatomy have had important implications for hypotheses concerning the development of the vertebrate skeleton.hypotheses就是P2提到的两种观点。全文的逻辑就是p1 的 discovery,p2两种观点,p1的discovery支持了观点2。 从来没有说是新旧对比!而是横向对比!