Conodonts, the spiky phosphatic remains(bones and teeth composed of calcium phosphate) of tiny marine animals that probably appeared about 520 million years ago, were once among the most controversial of fossils. Both the nature of the organism to which the remains belonged and the function of the remains were unknown. However, since the 1981 discovery of fossils preserving not just the phosphatic elements but also other remains of the tiny soft-bodied animals (also called conodonts) that bore them,scientists' reconstructions of the animals' anatomy have had important implications for hypotheses concerning the development of the vertebrate skeleton.
The vertebrate skeleton had traditionally been regarded as a defensive development, champions of this view postulating that it was only with the much later evolution of jaws that vertebrates became predators. The first vertebrates, which were soft-bodied, would have been easy prey for numerous invertebrate carnivores, especially if these early vertebrates were sedentary suspension feeders. Thus, traditionalists argued,these animals developed coverings of bony scales or plates, and teeth were secondary features, adapted from the protective bony scales. Indeed, external skeletons of this type are common among the well-known fossils of ostracoderms, jawless vertebrates that existed from approximately 500 to 400 million years ago. However, other paleontologists argued that many of the definitive characteristics of vertebrates, such as paired eyes and muscular and skeletal adaptations for active life, would not have evolved unless the first vertebrates were predatory. Teeth were more primitive than external armor according to this view, and the earliest vertebrates were predators.
The stiffening not ochord along the back of the body, V-shaped muscle blocks along the sides, and posterior tail fins help to identify conodonts as among the most primitive of vertebrates. The lack of any mineralized structures apart from the elements in the mouth indicates that conodonts were more primitive than the armored jawless fishes such as the ostracoderms. It now appears that the hard parts that first evolved in the mouth of an animal improved its efficiency as a predator, and that aggression rather than protection was the driving force behind the origin of the vertebrate skeleton.
It can be inferred that on the basis of the1981 discovery of conodont remains, paleontologists could draw which of the following conclusions?
The earliest vertebrates were sedentary suspension feeders.
Ostracoderms were not the earliest vertebrates.
Defensive armor preceded jaws among vertebrates.
Paired eyes and adaptations for activity are definitive characteristics of vertebrates.
Conodonts were unlikely to have been predators.
题目分析:
文章推断题:基于1981的发现,古生物学家可以得出什么样的结论?
选项分析:
A选项:早期的脊椎动物是久坐悬浮物摄食者:1981的发现反驳了这个观点。
B选项:正确。O不是最早的脊椎动物:第三段说明C的身体结构比O更原始,所以O一定不是最早的脊椎动物。
C选项:防御性的甲比下巴更早出现:传统观点认为牙齿从骨鳞进化来的,但是1981的发现认为牙齿比骨鳞早出现。
D选项:眼睛和为了活动的适应性是定义脊椎动物的特点:在1981年以前,就已经用这些特征定义脊椎动物了。
E选项:C不是predator:文章最后表明C是predator。
C我觉得其实是没有这个定位,文章就没有说
D因为是原文的背景,不属于推断,只能说是已知知识,在1981之前就已经知道的,这种在推断题中也可以排除
B已经说明C早于D,即可以推断D不是最早的
A感觉是从这个虚拟语气中的出来的,但反正也不是很保险的答案
E是最后一段很明显的
C选项文中并没有提到Jaw和armor出现的时间关系呀,为什么在解答里把Jaw等同成了Teeth?
回过头来看,第一段一定要仔细看懂,否则后面容易跑偏
Conodonts 曾经是fossil里面最多争议的,已经发现的化石来自哪个器官,和具体功能都不清楚。直到1981年,科学家发现的化石可以重组conodont的解剖,深刻的影响了对脊椎动物骨架的发展的猜测。
然后第二段就说了传统观点和另外一波的观点(这里传统本身就有点误导,如果不小心可能会以为是相对dicovery前后的传统和新发现的对比,但第二段还没有提到discovery的影响)
第三段才是说新发现印证了第二种假设。
定位应该是在第三段,第一段只是说这个discovery对假设的意义,但并没有具体指出是什么意义。接下来第二段分别说明了两种对立的假说,第三段开始才提到了最开始的discovery的具体作用:help to identify conodonts as among the most primitive of vertebrates,The lack of any mineralized structures apart from the elements in the mouth indicates that conodonts were more primitive than the armored jawless fishes such as the ostracoderms.
如果全文的结构清晰,会帮助理解第三段的作用,然后就很好定位了
D选项是背景信息,不是支持或反对的结论
他是支持新观点的哦,原文里有提到这些features能更好证明最早的脊柱动物是predators
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
indicates that conodonts were more primitive than the armored jawless fishes such as the ostracoderms选B
在最后表达了C是捕食者,排除
定位The lack of any mineralized structures apart from the elements in the mouth indicates that conodonts were more primitive than the armored jawless fishes such as the ostracoderms.
怎么能快速定位这道题答案呢?文章脉络我掌握了,但意思没读懂,生词太多
D. Paired eyes and adaptations for activity are definitive characteristics of vertebrates.
OG: Paired eyes and adaptations for activity are definitive characteristics of vertebrates.是在1981之前就已得知的,古生物学家还根据这一点,研究了1981年的发现。
定位:1. /1981 discovery /of...
2. The vertebrate skeleton /had traditionally been regarded/ as a defensive development, ... that vertebrates /became predators/. The first vertebrates, ... would have been easy prey for numerous invertebrate carnivores, 一直虚拟语气,而第一段最后就提到了1981年的这个发现对于development of the vertebrate skeleton有重大意义,所以1981年发现与二段开头的观点相反,与However, other paleontologists 的观点一致,即第一批有脊动物是捕食者
The lack of any mineralized structures apart from the elements in the mouth indicates that conodonts were more primitive than the armored jawless fishes such as the ostracoderms.
DPaired eyes and adaptations for activity are definitive characteristics of vertebrates.
这篇真心难。。。
这道题选项有错误把,C和D是一样的
感觉这道题如果不是一句句看完,每句都懂,真的不知道怎么回答。请问老师有没有快速定位的办法?
问题为这帮科学家最终可能会有以下哪个结论,再次定位到最后一段,文章的论点。发现最后一句说的和选项都无关,只能再往前一句看看,找到conodonts were more primitive than the armored jawless fishes such as the ostracoderms.只有选项B符合。这种反复回原文看的题,还是挺浪费时间的。如果时间不足,可以换个思路做题,最后一句就是说谁比谁早的,选项中也只有B是说谁比谁早的。
这个定位方法好学习了
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论