The country of Ertland has never imported apples in any significant quantity because consumers there generally prefer the unique texture of Ertland-grown apples. Nevertheless, apple growers from Kosolia, a neighboring country, plan to sell their apples in Ertland by selling Kosolia-grown apples at half the price of local apples and promoting them as a nourishing, low-cost alternative.
Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the viability of the plan by Kosolia's apple growers to sell their apples in Ertland?
Most of the varieties of apples grown in Ertland were originally derived from common Kosolian varieties.
Consumers in Ertland tend to spend about the same proportion of their income on fresh fruits and vegetables as do consumers in Kosolia.
At times in the past, Ertland has exported significant quantities of apples to Kosolia.
Some varieties of apples grown in Kosolia can be harvested throughout most of the year, whereas the varieties grown in Ertland can be harvested only during two months of the year.
Profit of Ertland-grown apples are high enough in Ertland that growers, wholesalers, and retailers there could easily afford to reduce the price at which these apples are sold.
方案模式,
为了K苹果要推广到E地卖,半价出售
削弱,即可行性/可操作性/否定性副作用三选一
A、E苹果从K来,反原文,
B、EK人都喜欢新鲜水果蔬菜,无关
C、以前E从K进口很多苹果,NM价格、喜欢,无关
D、K苹果一年四季大丰收,E苹果只有两个月有,突出方案的可操作性、可行性,增强
E、E自己的苹果能降价,K不再有价格优势,竞争力不强,可行性弱,削弱,CORRECCT
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论