Scientists are discussing ways to remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by increasing the amount that is absorbed by plant life. One plan to accomplish this is to establish giant floating seaweed farms in the oceans. When the seaweed plants die, they will be disposed of by being burned for fuel.
Which of the following, if true, would indicate the most serious weakness in the plan above?
Some areas of ocean in the Southern Hemisphere do not contain sufficient nutrients to support large seaweed farms.
When a seaweed plant is burned, it releases an amount of carbon dioxide comparable to the amount it has absorbed in its lifetime.
Even if seaweed farms prove effective, some people will be reluctant to switch to this new fuel.
Each year about seven billion tons of carbon dioxide are released into the atmosphere but only about five billion tons are absorbed by plant life.
Seaweed farms would make more money by farming seaweed to sell as nutritional supplements than by farming seaweed to sell as fuel.
F:种植植物可以吸收二氧化碳
P: 为了减少污染
C: 科学家决定建一个水草工厂,且当植物死去可以烧了当燃料
WEA 方案
CQ:1.是否种植水草,死后燃烧有其他副作用导致不能减少污染,2.种植水草死后燃烧无法减少污染
A.无关
B.否定性副作用
C.无关
D.无关,对方案的评估没有关系,即使7千万只吸收了5千万,不影响方案的有效性
E.无关
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论