扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-CR-9
Scientists are discussing ways to remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by increasing the amount that is absorbed by plant life. One plan to accomplish this is to establish giant floating seaweed farms in the oceans. When the seaweed plants die, they will be disposed of by being burned for fuel.
Which of the following, if true, would indicate the most serious weakness in the plan above?
Some areas of ocean in the Southern Hemisphere do not contain sufficient nutrients to support large seaweed farms.
When a seaweed plant is burned, it releases an amount of carbon dioxide comparable to the amount it has absorbed in its lifetime.
Even if seaweed farms prove effective, some people will be reluctant to switch to this new fuel.
Each year about seven billion tons of carbon dioxide are released into the atmosphere but only about five billion tons are absorbed by plant life.
Seaweed farms would make more money by farming seaweed to sell as nutritional supplements than by farming seaweed to sell as fuel.
为了减少二氧化碳排出量，应该用吸收二氧化碳的植物，等他们吸收完死了就可以当作燃料烧了，weaken
B说的是，当水草被燃烧以后它的co2释放量与它这辈子的吸收量是相当的，所以这个方案是无效的。
错选D，D描述的只是一个现象并没有说海草和吸收二氧化碳的关系
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论