扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-SC-27
When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.
When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.
Including a call for female enfranchisement, a draft of the Declaration of Sentiments was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848 that Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote.
When the Declaration of Sentiments drafted by Elizabeth Cady Stanton was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Convention in 1848, a call for female enfranchisement had been included in it.
A call for female enfranchisement, included in Elizabeth Cady Stanton's draft of the Declaration of Sentiments in 1848, that was adopted by the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention.
When Elizabeth Cady Stanton drafted the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, she included in it a call for female enfranchisement.
B including a call的动作发出者是a draft, 不合逻辑
C when表同时发生，had been included不合逻辑
D 没有谓语动词
A. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement. 明显错，排除A；
B. that Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote 修饰前面的the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention，明显错误，排除B；
C. When the xxxx was adopted xxxxx in 1848, a call had been included in it. 根据A的意思猜测，时间顺序不对，a call 应该是 draft 的时候就写进去的，不是修改的时候；排除；
D.句子结构混乱，排除；
E.完美表达了句意，correct！
B、that修饰谁是个谜
C、when前后时态不一致，用过完非常尴尬，更改句意
D、“，that”修饰有误，句子成分残缺
本题的当她起草某份宣言时，她在宣言里纳入了一个关于女性的呼吁，纳入呼吁发生的时间确实只限制在起草宣言时，when的用法ok
2.if you write "when X, Y"... Y has to be IN THE SAME TIMEFRAME as X.
the "had ___ed" tense implies a DIFFERENT (earlier) timeframe, so, it's nonsense in that context.
B：a draft was adopted❌，that也没有就近修饰，不太好
1) 修饰成分应该尽量靠近修饰对象
2) 逗号+ -ed形容词的结构中, -ed形容词从语法上修饰的是逗号前最后一个名词
3) 分词短语在句首起状语作用,逻辑主语等于句子主语
c选项，最后的a call for female enfranchisement had been included in it. 这个 IT 产生歧义， 指的是Declaration of Sentiments 还是指Convention，语义比较模糊。 when the Declaration was adopted, a call had been included.A do B when C do D,when表示两个动作同时发生。这里had been表示在adopted之前included，时间逻辑互相冲突
BCS是draft the Declaration 所以B选项❌
B, 逻辑是：Elizabeth drafted the Declaration of Sentiments, the Declaration of Sentiments was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention,B句表述的是Elizabeth wrote Convention，错误
C, when the Declaration was adopted, a call had been included.A do B when C do D,when表示两个动作同时发生。这里had been表示在adopted之前included，时间逻辑互相冲突。
D, 构句错误。
B 一个草稿被采纳，A的意思是一份声明被采纳，这份声明被起草的时候如何如何，B错
C 当声明被采纳的时候，一个号召被包含在这个声明里
D 没有谓语动词，无法构成一个句子，错！
E当人在起草一份声明的时候，她把一个号召加了了这份声明里。
E更优。
include可以有主动有被动，人包含某物在……里是可以的
当declaration被采用的时候，一个有关女性解放的呼吁被包括了进去。when做状语，修饰的是included的动词。这句话没什么逻辑关系。如果是当declaration被采用的时候，一个有关女性解放的呼吁被引起，是合乎逻辑意思的。
E当ECS起草declaration（被在1848采用的宣言）的时候，她把女性解放的呼吁加了进去。逻辑更通畅。
关于被动语态：虽然ETS不区分主被动的优劣，但是被动的一个问题是，如果没有明确动作发出这（比如by，from等介词没有出现），就很容易导致主语不清的情况出现。比如C选项的has been included，可以by ECS，也可以by president，还可以by Barack Obama..等等。
sth is included in xx
sb include sth in xx