扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-SC-27
When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.
When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.
Including a call for female enfranchisement, a draft of the Declaration of Sentiments was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848 that Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote.
When the Declaration of Sentiments drafted by Elizabeth Cady Stanton was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Convention in 1848, a call for female enfranchisement had been included in it.
A call for female enfranchisement, included in Elizabeth Cady Stanton's draft of the Declaration of Sentiments in 1848, that was adopted by the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention.
When Elizabeth Cady Stanton drafted the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, she included in it a call for female enfranchisement.
choice c, when引导的时间状语从句和主句的timeframe是一致的。但是从逻辑顺序来说，was adopted发生在后，had been included发生在前。
choice e, correct, draft和include的发出者都是ECS，且两个动作在一个timeframe中
本题的当她起草某份宣言时，她在宣言里纳入了一个关于女性的呼吁，纳入呼吁发生的时间确实只限制在起草宣言时，when的用法ok
B 一个草稿被采纳，A的意思是一份声明被采纳，这份声明被起草的时候如何如何，B错
C 当声明被采纳的时候，一个号召被包含在这个声明里
D 没有谓语动词，无法构成一个句子，错！
E当人在起草一份声明的时候，她把一个号召加了了这份声明里。
E更优。
include可以有主动有被动，人包含某物在……里是可以的
如：You should include some examples in your essay. 你应该在论文里举些例子。
我擦，太TM搞了。1‘40’‘，这么多坑要趟，怎么理得出来哇。。。
B: A draft of the Declaration of Sentiments was adopted.
C:语法正确，意思也可以先保留
D:没有谓语动词
E:语法和意思都正确，和C的区别在于E明确指出了include的发出者就是ECS这个人
B. that ECS wrote的宾语从句修饰不当
C. a call for female..在起草前就被囊括在其中了..不妥
D. 缺少谓语
E. correct
B中that后面修饰对象搞错了...Cady draft的是declaration
when drafted, a call included in
逻辑上，是在写的时候include内容
if you write "when X, Y"...
Y has to be IN THE SAME TIMEFRAME as X.
that's the whole point of the "when" construction.
the "had ___ed" tense implies a DIFFERENT (earlier) timeframe, so, it's nonsense in that context.
C ！是的登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
included 逻辑上修饰enfranchisement
当declaration被采用的时候，一个有关女性解放的呼吁被包括了进去。when做状语，修饰的是included的动词。这句话没什么逻辑关系。如果是当declaration被采用的时候，一个有关女性解放的呼吁被引起，是合乎逻辑意思的。
E当ECS起草declaration（被在1848采用的宣言）的时候，她把女性解放的呼吁加了进去。逻辑更通畅。
关于被动语态：虽然ETS不区分主被动的优劣，但是被动的一个问题是，如果没有明确动作发出这（比如by，from等介词没有出现），就很容易导致主语不清的情况出现。比如C选项的has been included，可以by ECS，也可以by president，还可以by Barack Obama..等等。
说得好登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
C说的是include这个动作发生在adopt之前，没说在draft之前
When引导的从句和主句代表同时发生，要一个时态
My mum had been teaching for ten years when I was ten. 这句子有错么？
过去完成时的动作是不能持续到现在的。过去完成时的动作在过去的过去发生，在过去（simple past）已经结束，强调的是对过去（simple past）有影响。这道题的include在过去发生，但是将一直持续，用过去完成时是不对的。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
C 过去完成时 错