连词or连接的是两个谓语动词 1) do not have 和2) are likely to have。答案中必须出现be动词are，又因为结合语意，1）不拥有和2）不太可能拥有都应该是带有否定成分。答案为choice d- nor are they
choice e, 双重否定变成了肯定，语意逻辑错误
many schools do not have, or are likely to have=many schools do not have, or many schools are likely to have，that's why not后面跟nor不跟or
nor和or/and一样是连词，that's why D选项后面跟了主语they，有两个独立的句子还是对的，因为nor是连词，且是并列连词！！
FANBOYS：for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so
是否可变成“do not have, nor are likely to”?
NO. you can't do that unless you have a "neither" in front.
the schools neither have, nor are likely to have, ...this would work.
This an idiomatic construction: nor + helping verb + subject.
CONJ You use nor after a negative statement in order to introduce another negative statement which adds information to the previous one. (用于否定句后，引出另一否定句以补充前句) 也不
Cooking up a quick dish doesn't mean you have to sacrifice flavor. Nor does fast food have to be junk food.
至于them和they是否必须指代同一名词，Manhattan里明确说了不必须
【其次，GMAT语法倾向于用same class的代词代表同一个名词。It与its是同一class，they，them和their是同一class。但是，这只是优先考虑的答案，并不是排除答案的规律。GMAT中有一些句子，用同一class里的代词指代不同的名词，如
Researchers claim to have developed new “nano-papers” incorporating tiny cellulose fibers, which THEY allege give THEM the strength of cast iron.
They，是谁声称？当然是研究者，所以they指代researchers；而them是指研究者吗？让谁更强韧呢？当然是纳米纸了，所以them指代nano-papers。】
选nor而非or的原因可能在于平行。首先sb be likely to have 是正确搭配，而插入语前面的句子是 many schools do not have，没有提供be动词，所以需要在选项里填补，be作为助动词，应该与do平行，not并不为插入语所分享，所以为了表达插入语暗含的否定含义，需要在选项里填补表示否定的nor，而非or。
3-好像平时说 -I like money! -So do I. -I do not want lose. -Neither/Nor do I.
CONJ You use nor after a negative statement in order to indicate that the negative statement also applies to you or to someone or something else. (用于否定句后，以表示此否定也适用于自己、他人或别的事情) 也不
2-this an idiomatic construction: nor + helping verb + subject.
CONJ You use nor after a negative statement in order to introduce another negative statement which adds information to the previous one. (用于否定句后，引出另一否定句以补充前句) 也不
e.g.
Cooking up a quick dish doesn't mean you have to sacrifice flavor. Nor does fast food have to be junk food
扫描二维码，直接登录
D，nor+助动词+主语是个习惯用法，表示也不能；这里不能改成nor are或nor they are，只有neither/nor才可以构成平行
be likely to.. 不能省略be
现在知道如果前面是否定，也可以用nor
在CD中间犹豫了一下，还是错选，主要当时一瞬间闪过的想法是neither nor；现在知道如果前面是否定，也可以用nor
连词or连接的是两个谓语动词 1) do not have 和2) are likely to have。答案中必须出现be动词are，又因为结合语意，1）不拥有和2）不太可能拥有都应该是带有否定成分。答案为choice d- nor are they
choice e, 双重否定变成了肯定，语意逻辑错误
many schools do not have, or are likely to have=many schools do not have, or many schools are likely to have，that's why not后面跟nor不跟or
nor和or/and一样是连词，that's why D选项后面跟了主语they，有两个独立的句子还是对的，因为nor是连词，且是并列连词！！
FANBOYS：for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so
E选项双重否定
前面ABC成分残缺
likely to前面缺少一个be动词，所以ab 不平行，排除
c表示没有 或者有可能有 排除
nor=not or 不用再加not 选D
NOR = NOT OR
Nor=not or
nor = not or
是否可变成“do not have, nor are likely to”?
NO. you can't do that unless you have a "neither" in front.
the schools neither have, nor are likely to have, ...this would work.
This an idiomatic construction: nor + helping verb + subject.
CONJ You use nor after a negative statement in order to introduce another negative statement which adds information to the previous one. (用于否定句后，引出另一否定句以补充前句) 也不
Cooking up a quick dish doesn't mean you have to sacrifice flavor. Nor does fast food have to be junk food.
nor 是conj，连接句子。因为many schools的动词是do，而likely的搭配是be likely to，所以不能省略are，必须补出来。
宗老板：C句意不对！
or用在这里其实句意上就矛盾了
A B 因为不平行 out
E 因为双重否定 out
C 用了or out
B 在这里形式上平行 句意上完美
many schools do not have nor are they likely to have √
至于them和they是否必须指代同一名词，Manhattan里明确说了不必须
【其次，GMAT语法倾向于用same class的代词代表同一个名词。It与its是同一class，they，them和their是同一class。但是，这只是优先考虑的答案，并不是排除答案的规律。GMAT中有一些句子，用同一class里的代词指代不同的名词，如
Researchers claim to have developed new “nano-papers” incorporating tiny cellulose fibers, which THEY allege give THEM the strength of cast iron.
They，是谁声称？当然是研究者，所以they指代researchers；而them是指研究者吗？让谁更强韧呢？当然是纳米纸了，所以them指代nano-papers。】
赞！
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
选nor而非or的原因可能在于平行。首先sb be likely to have 是正确搭配，而插入语前面的句子是 many schools do not have，没有提供be动词，所以需要在选项里填补，be作为助动词，应该与do平行，not并不为插入语所分享，所以为了表达插入语暗含的否定含义，需要在选项里填补表示否定的nor，而非or。
3-好像平时说 -I like money! -So do I. -I do not want lose. -Neither/Nor do I.
CONJ You use nor after a negative statement in order to indicate that the negative statement also applies to you or to someone or something else. (用于否定句后，以表示此否定也适用于自己、他人或别的事情) 也不
2-this an idiomatic construction: nor + helping verb + subject.
CONJ You use nor after a negative statement in order to introduce another negative statement which adds information to the previous one. (用于否定句后，引出另一否定句以补充前句) 也不
e.g.
Cooking up a quick dish doesn't mean you have to sacrifice flavor. Nor does fast food have to be junk food