搬运CD上的解释:
1-是不是可以变成“do not have, nor are likely to” 因为Nor本身就包含了一个“否定”的意思?
nope. you can't do that unless you have a "neither" in front.
i.e.:
the schools neither have, nor are likely to have, ...
this would work.
也就是说nor 不可以像and but一样做一个附加否定含义的连词,除非和neither连用
CONJ You use nor after "neither" in order to introduce the second alternative or the last of a number of alternatives in a negative statement. (用于)(neither)(后,以引出被否定的第二项或几项中的最后一项) 也不
2、如果前面是主谓结构的否定句,而第二个连结部分只是没有主语的动词短语时,即前后主语一致,那么既可以用nor 也可以用or。
He cannot find anyone now, nor /or expects to find anyone in the future.
You could not persuade him to accept it, nor/or make him see the importance of it.
但是例二中,由于第一个句子的主语是Jane,第二个是Bill,前后主语不一致。因此不能用这种方法改写。
用 nor 或 or 表示“既不…也不”时,有两条规则可循。
1、如果前后都是独立句子的主谓结构完整的否定句,那么第二个必须用nor连接的倒装句。如:
He cannot find anyone now, nor does he expect to find anyone in the future
Jane will never compromise with Bill, nor will Bill compromise with Jane.
many schools do not have, or likely to have,应该是很多学校没有,或可能有
(B) nor作为连词,do not have, nor likely to have不平行, 应该在nor后面加上are, 使are likely to…和do not have构成动词结构的并列或者将likely to去掉,构成do not have, nor have的平列
(c) is, as far as i can tell grammatically correct (although the commas are superfluous in such a construction), but it's simply absurd. the use of "or" here creates a sentence that is weirdly self-contradictory.
the clear point of the sentence is that the schools don't have enough computers, so you need to select the choice that's grammatically correct but also in line with that meaning. (d) is the only choice that satisfies both criteria.
1-是不是可以变成“do not have, nor are likely to” 因为Nor本身就包含了一个“否定”的意思?
nope. you can't do that unless you have a "neither" in front.
i.e.:
the schools neither have, nor are likely to have, ...
this would work.
也就是说nor 不可以像and but一样做一个附加否定含义的连词,除非和neither连用
CONJ You use nor after "neither" in order to introduce the second alternative or the last of a number of alternatives in a negative statement. (用于)(neither)(后,以引出被否定的第二项或几项中的最后一项) 也不
D, they-them代词指代不一致——非决定性错误
选B
He cannot find anyone now, nor /or expects to find anyone in the future.
You could not persuade him to accept it, nor/or make him see the importance of it.
但是例二中,由于第一个句子的主语是Jane,第二个是Bill,前后主语不一致。因此不能用这种方法改写。
1、如果前后都是独立句子的主谓结构完整的否定句,那么第二个必须用nor连接的倒装句。如:
He cannot find anyone now, nor does he expect to find anyone in the future
Jane will never compromise with Bill, nor will Bill compromise with Jane.
这道题如果使用or,前后逻辑不通,用nor(既不···也不···)更合适
用NOR会更好一点,同时LIKELY需要 BE动词,所以D
D
D
(B) nor作为连词,do not have, nor likely to have不平行, 应该在nor后面加上are, 使are likely to…和do not have构成动词结构的并列或者将likely to去掉,构成do not have, nor have的平列
因为前半部分的平行有主谓,所以画线部分也必须有
nor否定词提前,用部分到装
同问登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
语义上最合理解释成立就可以。
或者这么说:我记得有份材料解释过,代词解释不能够跳跃动词。them不能跳过have指代schools。这个解释不是最佳,但是如果可以帮助理解,可参考。
B nor 是conj,连接句子。因为many schools的动词是do,而likely的搭配是be likely to,所以不能省略are,必须补出来。D
最后一条不是回复你,抱歉。。登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
the clear point of the sentence is that the schools don't have enough computers, so you need to select the choice that's grammatically correct but also in line with that meaning. (d) is the only choice that satisfies both criteria.