扫描二维码，直接登录
题库 / Prep2007E1-SC-49
The automobile company announced that the average price of next year's models would decrease four-tenths of one percent, amounting to about $72, as compared with comparably equipped cars and trucks this year.
The automobile company announced that the average price of next year's models would decrease four-tenths of one percent, amounting to about $72, as compared with comparably equipped cars and trucks this year.
The automobile company announced that the average price of next year's cars and trucks would decrease four-tenths of one percent, or about $72, from that of comparably equipped models this year.
The automobile company announced that there would be a decrease of four-tenths of one percent in next year's models' average price, or about $72, below this year's comparably equipped cars and trucks.
Compared to comparably equipped models this year, the automobile company announced that the average price of next year's cars and trucks would decrease about $72, less by four-tenths of one percent.
Contrasted with comparably equipped cars and trucks of this year, the automobile company announced that the average price of next year's models would decrease about $72, or four-tenths of one percent.
题目分析：
本题看起来很长，但是只要能把主干成分划清，很容易得到正确答案。选项A中的amounting to about $72是现在分词短语，做定语修饰four-tenths of one percent，没有错误。
选项分析：
A选项：首先，我们需要将as compared with改为from。这是因为，本句的意思是，明年这个模型的价格将从今年价格的基础上下降72刀，即，decrease A from B。如果用as compared with，则变成A和B的比较了，不符合句子的意思。例如：
The good preparing method decrease 10 mins from the original preparing time.
这句话的意思是，这个好的方法将准备时间减少了10分钟，我们不能写成：
The good preparing method decrease 10 mins as compared with the original preparing time.
这句话的意思是，这个好的方法减少了10分钟，这个10分钟是对比于原来的准备时间的。
其次，比较对象也不对等。应该是钱和钱的比较，不能是钱和车的比较，即，需要改为：
that of comparably equipped cars and trucks this year.
B选项：Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
C选项：需要将as compared with改为from，措辞错误同(A)；比较对象错误同(A)。
D选项：句首出现的compared to是伴随状语，其字面上的主语必须是其主句主语the automobile company。这在逻辑上有误，不能用the automobile company和模型比较。
E选项：本选项错误同(D)。
看e的错法
decrease A from B 从b减少了A 注意⚠️
做的太慢了..虽然做对了....
DE一定要明确v-ed...,SOV中，v-ed对于S的可修饰性
amounting to 算是夹心修饰了吧
选项c的能否用论元是否需要原则排除？models average price 在这里不作为论元，而比较关系要求其应作为论元
amounting to 为什么没有错误呢？doing形式不是用来做状语的吗？如果用来做定语不应该是被修饰词是动作的发出者吗？
sei能告诉我怎么删掉误发的内容
哈哈哈你太可爱了 可惜我也不知道
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
amounting to的用法没问题，但是逻辑主语是the price，这个是有问题的
amount
a的比较对象有问题，the price和cars and trucks不能比较，amounting to没问题
this sort of construction -- comma + "or" + noun -- is used when you have two equivalent formulations of something, and you are trying to introduce the fact that they are equivalent.
notice that this is not the usual use of "or" to indicate an option between two things; this is a special use of "or" to indicate a definition or equivalence.
更简单的理解：A选项中，as compared with 比较的对象前面是price，后面是cars and trucks，所以不对。
至少需要改成as compared with prices of comparably equipped cars and trucks this year.
做题目超时了
选项A是下一年的model比今年的cars and trucks价格低，而B是下一年的cars and trucks的价格比今年的model低，这不是改变了原句的意思吗…还是说model和cars and trucks是一种事物？
感觉：A中的amounting to about $72是现在分词短语，做定语修饰four-tenths of one percent，是形式上可以，但是意思上似乎不可以。如果是做定语的话，类似which amount to about 72. 前置词是percent，非限定修饰在逻辑意思上成了percent amounts to 72,实际上应该是4/1000 of the price amount to 72.
不知道这么推导对不对？
跳跃修饰的现象在正确选项中十分常见，不能依据“严格”的就近修饰原则判断。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论