Unlike using spices for cooking, in medicinal usage they are taken in large quantities in order to treat particular maladies.
Unlike using spices for cooking, in medicinal usage they are taken
Unlike spices that are used in cooking, in using spices for medicine, they are taken
Unlike cooking with spices, taking spices for medicinal use is done
In cooking, small quantities of spices are used, whereas in medicinal usage spices are taken
In cooking, the usage of spices is in small quantities, whereas in medicinal usage they are taken
题目分析:
本题虽然不长,但选项C和选项D的判断较难。
选项分析:
A选项:unlike连接的两个名词需要在逻辑上平行,即,应该是using XXX和using XXX做比较。
B选项:本选项unlike连接的两者不可比,错误同(A)。
C选项:Unlike是介词,对比对象是主句的主语。在对比对象这个环节上,本选项没有错误。但是,unlike只是表示两个名词具有对比关系,例如:
Unlike A, B is round.
从例句中,我们只能知道A不是圆的,但是A是什么形状,我们并不能明确得知。若例句为:
A is square, whereas B is round
则其揭示了两个句子的关系。
用之于本题,显然地,要想形成对比关系,应该描述清楚cooking with spices的用量。
D选项:Correct. 本选项在语法和逻辑上均是正确的。
E选项:本选项可能有些难以判断。实际上,仅仅考查了一个很基础的“实质平行”。Whereas是连词,表示前后两句话有对比关系。真正具有对比关系的,应该是small quantities of spices are used(这里的重心词是use这个事件)和take,而不是本选项中的 the usage of spices is in small quantities(这里的be动词这个状态)和take。但在逻辑上,真正能对比的对象应该是use和take。
D选项”are used“、”are taken“可以对比
E选项 the usage of spices 和take无法对比
C,taking spices for medicinal use is done in large quantities表示在药里放辣椒这件事被大量做,频繁发生,不表示大量辣椒被放在药里
E,主句主语是usage,从句主语是spices,中间有个whereas表转折,A如何如何,然而B如何如何,两者转折不起来,A在某事里如何如何,A在另一事里却如何如何,这才是作者想表达的转折的意思,对应的逻辑才是合理的
whereas in medicinal usage spices are taken---d
whereas in medicinal usage they are taken---e
ron说过看代词用的对不对有没有ambiguous就看选项中有没有不用代词的选项,如果有,那么就应该选不用代词的那一项
c。taking spiders for cooking
cd二选一,c补齐应该是 Unlike taking spices for cooking, taking spices for mdecine, cooking 不是比较对象。
B,Unlike spices that are used in cooking, spices are taken in large quantities in using spices for medicine,
(1)Spices are taken in using spices重复,(2)辣椒在医疗领域被大量使用,不像被用在饮食上的辣椒。没有比较出是二者的用量不一样,比如也可以看成是用在医疗领域的是A品种的辣椒,不同于用在饮食领域的是B品种辣椒。
D,In cooking, small quantities of spices are used, whereas in medicinal usage spices are taken in large quantities. 前半部分的主语是quantities,表数量,可以将实质主语看成是辣椒,少量的辣椒被使用,与后面的句子平行。
E,前句的主语是the usage of spices,usage,与后面的句子不平行。
C,Unlike cooking with spices, taking spices for medicinal use is done in large quantities in order to treat particular maladies.
句子的主语是taking spices,for medicinal use作定语修饰主语,类似于to do做定语,如I have many letters to write或We have made a plan to learn from Jack
C简化下就是taking spices unlike cooking,比较对象错误。
E:真正具有对比关系的,应该是small quantities of spices are used(这里的重心词是use这个事件)和take,而不是本选项中的 the usage of spices is in small quantities(这里的be动词这个状态)和take。但在逻辑上,真正能对比的对象应该是use和take。
Unlike是介词,对比对象是主句的主语。在对比对象这个环节上,本选项没有错误。但是,unlike只是表示两个名词具有对比关系,例如:
Unlike A, B is round.
从例句中,我们只能知道A不是圆的,但是A是什么形状,我们并不能明确得知。若例句为:
A is square, whereas B is round
则其揭示了两个句子的关系。
用之于本题,显然地,要想形成对比关系,应该描述清楚cooking with spices的用量。
着重看c选项
D选项平行
E选项usage of spices is in small quantities语义模糊,可能表示spices不经常用,一旦用就会用很多,与想表达的意思不符。
A选项 比较对象不平行using和they比较;主语前面不能加介词
B选项 后面的they没指出in medicine;主语前面不能有介词短语; in using应该有who,否则用usage;using spices for medicine表示spices用于medicine的生产
第一遍选对...第二遍选错了...晕厥...
E的they的指代问题!!
VERBING is done 是不存在的
in medical usage they are taken
In (D) - '...spices are used' and 'spices are taken' are parallel.
In (E) - '.. 'the usage of spices is small quantities' and '..in medical usage they are taken' are not parallel.
MARK
E: the "usage"...is in small quantities--WRONG
C:"taking...is done in large quantities"--WRONG
one could say that d isn't 100% parallel, but it's definitely more parallel than the other choices: in cooking, (noun) is used (passive voice construction); in medicinal usage, (noun) are taken (passive voice construction).
the usage of spies 不能in small quantities, 这样像是在表达spies使用的次数少
they是完全指代,是连定语一块指代