According to P. F. Drucker, the management philosophy known as Total Quality Management (TQM), which is designed to be adopted consistently throughout an organization and to improve customer service by using sampling theory to reduce the variability of a product's quality, can work successfully in conjunction with two older management systems. As Drucker notes, TQM's scientific approach is consistent with the statistical sampling techniques of the "rationalist" school of scientific management, and the organizational structure associated with TQM is consistent with the social and psychological emphases of the "human relations" school of management.
However, TQM cannot simply be grafted onto these systems or onto certain other non-TQM management systems. Although, as Drucker contends, TQM shares with such systems the ultimate objective of increasing profitability, TQM requires fundamentally different strategies. While the other management systems referred to use upper management decision-making and employee specialization to maximize shareholder profits over the short term, TQM envisions the interests of employees, shareholders, and customers as convergent. For example, lower prices not only benefit consumers but also enhance an organization's competitive edge and ensure its continuance, thus benefiting employees and owners. TQM's emphasis on shared interests is reflected in the decentralized decision-making, integrated production activity, and lateral structure of organizations that achieve the benefits of TQM.
Which of the following best describes the relationship of the second paragraph to the first paragraph?
It presents contrasting explanations for a phenomenon presented in the first paragraph.
It discusses an exception to a general principle outlined in the first paragraph.
It provides information that qualifies a claim presented in the first paragraph.
It presents an example that strengthens a claim presented in the first paragraph.
It presents an alternative approach to solving a problem discussed in the first paragraph.
题目分析:
题目释义:
细节题目
考点:
逻辑结构(Logical structure)
旨在考察我们对文章结构的认知,以及对作者行文目的的判断。
第二段开头就出现“however”,说明第二段和第一段存在一定的反对或是限定关系。从原文中来看,第一段说TQM可以有效的与其它系统结合,第二段说不能简单的嫁接。所以第二段可以认为是对第一段提出的这个概念的一个限定。
选项分析:
A选项:它提出了关于第一段描述的现象的截然不同的解释。第二段不是对TQM的完全不同的解读,而是对第一段说的比较宽泛的范围进行的一个较小的限定。
B选项:它讨论了第一段突出的普遍的原则的一个例外。这个选项较易误选。注意,第一段的如果是一个普遍的原则的话,第二段并没有论证这个原则是不适用于某些地方的,而说它是有条件的适用的。
C选项:Correct. 它提出限定第一段的论点的信息。同“考点”的解释。
D选项:它提出了一个加强第一段提到的论点的例子。第二段的没有加强第一段的论点,相反的,可以理解为削弱第一段的论点。
E选项:它提出了对第一段所讨论的问题的令一种探讨。第二段所讲述的问题并不是一种全新的理解。而是在现有的基础上做限制。
P2是对P1的限定qualify, 并不是反对oppose
qualify 限定
结构: 第一段表示a一部分继承b一部分继承c 第二段表示a和b和c本质是不一样的。 a和e错在第二段并没有给出解释(原因)并且第二段是对第一段的一种修正 而非全新的解释
第二段可以认为是对第一段提出的这个概念的一个限定 qualify 限定
qualify v.限定
qualifies a claim=限定一个claim
make (a statement or assertion) less absolute; add reservations to.
she felt obliged to qualify her first short answer
同义词: modify, limit, restrict, make conditional, moderate, temper, modulate, mitigate
COPY from rona:
可直接排除的:B,D,E
总觉得however后面所代表的的就是对立面,所以看到contrast,contradict就特别容易激动,然后就乱选
首先,这里对GMAT RC文章类型做个分类小结:
①针对一个主题提出两个完全对立的观点
→A.有可能是后期发现对前期发现的颠覆(新的evidence→conclusion的颠覆)
→B.有可能就是两个对立的观点(公说公有理婆说婆有理)
②对某一主题加以修正、补充说明
→前期提出某个观点,但这个观点考虑不够完善,基于新的考量因素、新的evidence→conclusion的修正
③对某一主题进行多角度、多层次、多方面的讨论
既不相互对立、也没相互补充,就是各说各的观点
关于这道题,原文:However, TQM cannot simply be grafted onto these systems or onto certain other non-TQM management systems.→不能简单地被嫁接不是表达对立的意思,更表达补充修正之意,应选C
感谢!出处的总结在哪?
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
qualifies a claim 修饰 限定
qualify限定详述
可直接排除的:B,D,E
我这里有一个思维,总觉得however后面所代表的的就是对立面,所以看到contrast,contradict就特别容易激动,然后就乱选
首先,这里对GMAT RC文章类型做个分类小结:
①针对一个主题提出两个完全对立的观点
→A.有可能是后期发现对前期发现的颠覆(新的evidence→conclusion的颠覆)
→B.有可能就是两个对立的观点(公说公有理婆说婆有理)
②对某一主题加以修正、补充说明
→前期提出某个观点,但这个观点考虑不够完善,基于新的考量因素、新的evidence→conclusion的修正
③对某一主题进行多角度、多层次、多方面的讨论
既不相互对立、也没相互补充,就是各说各的观点
关于这道题,原文:However, TQM cannot simply be grafted onto these systems or onto certain other non-TQM management systems.→不能简单地被嫁接不是表达对立的意思,更表达补充修正之意,应选C
qualify:4、V-T If you qualify a statement, you make it less strong or less general by adding a detail or explanation to it. (通过增加细节、解释) 使语气缓和; 使…不太笼统
qualifies a claim=限定一个claim
qualifies a claim..限定一个claim :(
qualify
vt.限定,修饰;描述,形容;使合适;证明…合格
qualify还有限定的意思。。。
qualify:to add sth to a previous statement to make the meaning less strong or less general
qualify
vt.限定,修饰;描述,形容;使合适;证明…合格
果然还是要多看阅读,没有理解qualify the claim就无法选择正确答案。“限定论点”
qualify限定