The success of the program to eradicate smallpox has stimulated experts to pursue what they had not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as measles and yaws.
what they had not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as
what they had not previously considered a possibility--better control, if not eradication, of such infections like
something they had not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of such infections as
something not considered a previous possibility--better control and perhaps eradication, of other infections such as
the possibility of what they had not previously considered--better control and possibly eradication of infections like
- Major problem is "THE other infections." THE is too definitive here, carrying the connotation of "every single one of the other infections."
* THE is also incompatible with "such as":
- Correct: I never read this book, but I read the other books on the shelf.
- Correct: I never read this book, but I read other books on the shelf, such as "Right Hand, Left Hand" and "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich."
- Incorrect: I never read this book, but I read the other books on the shelf, such as "Right Hand, Left Hand" and "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich."
- Minor problem is "what they had not..." vs. "something they had not..." The "what" construction is awfully strong, suggesting that this was THE ONE THING they hadn't thought possible.
* As an analogy, compare the meanings of "I want to do what I love for a living" and "I want to do something I love for a living." The first suggests that the speaker has one particular field in mind; the second doesn't.
剩下ACD,A有个很大的问题是 what 在从句中表示很明确的事情,something则是不那么确定的;
比如:this is what you are talking about 和 it's something unpredictable blabla 读一下就能感觉到区别(可能举例并不是很恰当)
其次是such as 和 infections的位置:
D的 better control and perhaps eradication, of other infections such as。。是不是感觉such as应该是治疗的方式而不是修饰infection的
*之前有道题,提到过lock word的概念,英文中为了避免语义混乱,会用一些词来锁定彼此的修饰。
剩下C
第一种情况:总数是两个,one....the other....一个另一个;
第二种情况:总数是多数,“some.....the other+名词复数”,一些......剩余的那些......”,相加等于同一个类型的总数
The implication here is that there are SOME other infections
others只说明了其他,没说明任何类似相关性
such like是不存在的结构,不考虑,B不对
the other就特指某些,代表范围是限定的,这时候出现such as是奇怪的,所以A 不对
Pursue possibility, 句意奇怪,E不对
在D中,something和possibility等于都做了considered的宾语,错误
错选a
pursue 从事,致力于
something代替what从句,简洁明了;
a中后面用了the other,但是前面没有跟它搭配的one 。。the other
one the other只有两个
some the others 有三个及以上
one 。。another。。
some 。。others。。
1. better control of the other infections such as--a中“更好的控制剩下所有的感染病比如”?语意不对。
2. A使用what而C使用something,两者在语法上没错,但what强调的是某个特定的事,something没有强调特定的事;此外,A选项的the other使用错误,正确的结构应该是one ... the other ...。此外,the other 和 such as是不兼容的,正确的表达应该是of other infections such as ...
BD去掉了
然后E的语义不对把 pursue possibility
2.such as和the other永远不能同时出现!such as表示举例,不是穷举。而the other表示除此之外的所有,是穷举
2. A使用what而C使用something,两者在语法上没错,但what强调的是某个特定的事,something没有强调特定的事;此外,A选项的the other使用错误,正确的结构应该是one ... the other ...。此外,the other 和 such as是不兼容的,正确的表达应该是of other infections such as ...
1. better control of other infections such as---后面举例的就应该是control的手段 如果是better control of such infections as--后面举例的就应该是infection,非划线部分的两个例子是感染,所以A的结构是肯定不对的
2. A使用what而C使用something,两者在语法上没错,但what强调的是某个特定的事,something没有强调特定的事;此外,A选项的the other使用错误,正确的结构应该是one ... the other ...。此外,the other 和 such as是不兼容的,正确的表达应该是of other infections such as ...