According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin, the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era, can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who were ancestors of modern Native Americans. However, anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them. Nor were extinctions confined to large animals: small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption. Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. Still, Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians, arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere. But, according to historian Richard White, even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence. White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them; yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech's objections to Martin's theory?
Further studies showing that the climatic change that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene era was even more severe and widespread than was previously behaved
New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct
Additional evidence indicating that widespread climatic change occurred not only at the end of the Pleistocene era but also in previous and subsequent eras
Researchers' discoveries that many more species became extinct in North America at the end of the Pleistocene era than was previously believed
New discoveries establishing that both the arrival of humans in North America and the wave of Pleistocene extinctions took place much earlier than 11,000 years ago
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 E。Krech 否认 Martin 的理论,基本上依赖于人类到达北美和大型动物物种消失的时间以及它们之间的关联。因此,如果有新发现表明人类到达和物种消失也都发生在 11000 年之前,这就会削弱 Krech 的反对 Martin 理论的观点,因此 E 是正确答案。
“Still, Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians, arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere.“ 这句话难道不是指K也觉得人对物种灭绝负有不可推卸的责任吗?前面K自己又说人不是主要原因
是文章有问题还是我的理解有问题,我觉得K在自相矛盾!!!!
K反对M的点在于是说M说人类捕杀动物,而K说人类并没有直接捕杀但是要付主要责任。
secondary次要责任。前面K强烈反对M对人类到来导致物种灭绝的观点,Still后面迂回折中了一下,认为人类其实也有一定原因只不过他认为不主要。
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论