According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin, the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era, can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who were ancestors of modern Native Americans. However, anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them. Nor were extinctions confined to large animals: small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption. Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. Still, Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians, arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere. But, according to historian Richard White, even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence. White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them; yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago.
In the last sentence of the passage, the author refers to "recent archaeological discoveries" (see highlighted text) most probably in order to
refute White's suggestion that neither Martin nor Krech adequately account for Paleoindians' contributions to the Pleistocene extinctions
cast doubt on the possibility that a more definitive theory regarding the causes of the Pleistocene extinctions may be forthcoming
suggest that Martin's, Krech's, and White's theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions are all open to question
call attention to the most controversial aspect of all the current theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions
provide support for White's questioning of both Martin's and Krech's positions regarding the role of Paleoindians in the Pleistocene extinctions
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 E。最后一句话提到最近的考古发现支持了 Richard White 对于 Paul Martin 和 Shepard Krech 的 Pleistocene 灭绝观点的质疑,因此选择了 E 选项,即提供对 White 关于 Martin 和 Krech 对 Pleistocene 灭绝角色的质疑的支持。
这题不需要搞清每个人的观点,往前找,有个but,说明这里一定是一个position,那么后面就是illustrate和explain。因为这里前面有个分号,所以yet不当做转折、提出另一个position来使用,分号的意义是和分号前的内容有关联,要么承接,支持分号前面的illustrate,要么是支持前前句的另一个分explain。所以就是w对M和K这两个人的质疑
我选了D, 但是答案是E
我没有选E是因为,我觉得整篇文章谈的是P extinction的原因,而不是human对P extingction的影响?
我错了吗?
call attention to the most controversial aspect 我觉得整篇文章已经是在讨论human是否是引起extinction的因素了,并不需要call attention to了
首先要搞清楚他们中的几个人到底支持什么样的观点:
Martin:灭绝是由人类造成的
krech:人类是灭绝的第二原因,气候也是灭绝的原因
white: martin的论文是依靠人类出现的时间和灭绝的时间一致所以将人类归结为原因,而krech发现了Martin的这个问题,但是没有指出来
最后证据显示人类的到来其实比灭绝要早11000年----灭绝不是人类导致的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
人类出现早于11000年前不应该说明人类有可能对灭绝造成影响么
前面有个分号,所以yet不当做转折、提出另一个position来使用,分号的意义是和分号前的内容有关联,要么承接,支持分号前面的illustrate,
In the last sentence of the passage, the author refers to "recent archaeological discoveries" most probably in order to?
White发现Martin的thesis取决于人类到来的时间与大型动物的灭绝的时间相同,而Krech虽然意识到了时间有争议,但他并没有提出异议。但最近的考古研究证明人类到来的时间其实早了11000年。因此说明人类到来与灭绝没有直接关系。因此反对Martin和Krech,也就是支持了White。
怎么解决第一遍看不懂的问题,,
多练习
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
最后一句是支撑White的观点的 只要是否定W的都应排除 ,并且W的观点和M K也是不同的 所以
立刻排除ABC
D‘most’在文中无法体现
选E
Martin认为:directly attributed to the arrival of humans
K认为:attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions
然而,灭绝的时间是在11,000年前,W提出,人类出现的时间与灭绝的时间存在分歧,人类的出现不一定是灭绝的原因。
→ yet后提供人类出现的时间的证据,早于11000, → 存在分歧,支持了W的观点
White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them
M的理论中特定选取了人类到达和动物灭绝巧合的时间点,K尽管意识到了但没有公然挑战这些时间。-> 高亮部分是为了支持W对M,K的challenge
But, according to historian Richard White, even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence.
这句话表明White的观点:现在的证据可能都没办法支持人类活动是第二个首要原因。
后面就开始写White的理由是因为在”发生时间“上这件事情很有争议。
所以后面的关于新的时间证据就是进一步支持了White的观点:人类活动并不是造成灭绝的重要原因。
我没有选e的原因是读到c的时候就没有再读下去,我想前面两个人的观点既然对不对,white的观点肯定也有漏洞,毫不犹豫的选了c...
文章的每一句话都有它的用意,尤其首尾
仅看最后一句话,是读不出它的作用的,要连着看倒数第二句
做题时一定要回文中读懂~