According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin, the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era, can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who were ancestors of modern Native Americans. However, anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them. Nor were extinctions confined to large animals: small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption. Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. Still, Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians, arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere. But, according to historian Richard White, even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence. White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them; yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago.
Which of the following is true about Martin's theory, as that theory is described in the passage?
It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.
It denies that the Pleistocene species extinctions were caused by climate change.
It uses as evidence the fact that humans have produced local extinctions in other situations.
It attempts to address the controversy over the date of human arrival in North America.
It admits the possibility that factors other than the arrival of humans played a role in the Pleistocene extinctions.
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案:E. 它承认除了人类入侵之外,其他因素也可能在更新世物种灭绝中发挥了作用。
Martin 理论承认Paleoindians 主要依赖狩猎来生存是不对的,因为这段文字未提及,所以 A 选项错误。它也否认 Palseontienne 物种灭绝的原因是气候变化是错误的,因为它引用了Krech 的理论,即存在大规模的气候变化,所以 B 选项错误。它也没有利用人类在其他情况下造成的局部灭绝作为证据,所以 C 选项错误。它也没有尝试解决有关人类入侵北美日期的争议,所以 D 选项错误。Martin 理论承认除了人类入侵之外,其他因素也可能在更新世物种灭绝中发挥了作用,因为结合 White 的观点,可以得出这一结论,所以 E 选项正确。
rc
must be true的问题,必须文中有提到,否则任何有make extra assumption的都不可以。
错选a,文中并没有说“It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.”即使是经常打猎,也不说明他们主要生存来源就是打猎,做了多余假设。
b,文中说“Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that” 并不是说martin没有考虑气候问题,而是排除了这个因素,,这句话理解偏了;martin's exclusion,Martin把。。排除,长难句理解
把exclusion想成了conclusion!!!%>_<%
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
exclusion没看到,定位
感觉有任务出现的时候都要记一下
人物
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论
Exclusion的意思究竟应该是Martin正面直接排除气候对灭绝的影响,还是说气候不是灭绝的影响因素之一或没有提到?
错误定位到White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them.这里M并没有提出对日期的争论!
正确定位Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene.
这句话没理解,意思是K反驳了M把气候变化排除掉.
粗心啊啊啊!定位句很明显“ Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation”
定位: Krech also contradicts Martin's 【exclusion】 of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene.
这题不该错...deny给看错了没反应过来
A:Martin没提到关于hunting的问题,即使Paleoindians were not primarily dependent on hunting for survival,他们还是可以通过hunting导致物种灭绝
C:address the controversy解决争议
比較--注意差異
T:滅絕
A1人類-A2主要非人類(反例)+自然-A3非人類(反例)
重点词exclusion
定位错了
没有人选A吗?PM说了 人类造成大型动物的灭绝 - Hunting。 SK说 小动物跟植物也灭绝了, 所以跟人类hunting无关, 是天气问题。
contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation..... 你是瞎子吗,没看到exclusion !!!!!
Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene
M的理论排除了天气作为动物灭绝的原因
细节:exclusion--拒绝;排除
得做笔记和一定要回原文找细节,不要凭着记忆选,因为选项都是一些迷惑选项,很容易就被弄晕了!!!
三个人:PM:1、人类干的,2、climate干的
SK:1、人类没有hunt,2、不是大动物,3、不是天气(否认PM),4、怎么看都可能是人类
RW:否认SK,SK忽略了一个矛盾
A无中生有,文章没说,就算要选,也可能是SK而不是PM的观点(SK的第四个观点);B原文中有;C SK的第四个观点;D RW指出的SK无视的矛盾;E SK的第四个观点
在一篇文章有很多人持有观点时,每个人的观点都是一个PIE组合,要简要记录
错选3.evidence和in other situation 都不合文意,观点和人数多的情况还是写个简图好些
Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene
M的理论排除了天气作为动物灭绝的原因