According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin, the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era, can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who were ancestors of modern Native Americans. However, anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them. Nor were extinctions confined to large animals: small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption. Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. Still, Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians, arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere. But, according to historian Richard White, even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence. White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them; yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago.
In the last sentence of the passage, the author refers to "recent archaeological discoveries" (see highlighted text) most probably in order to
refute White's suggestion that neither Martin nor Krech adequately account for Paleoindians' contributions to the Pleistocene extinctions
cast doubt on the possibility that a more definitive theory regarding the causes of the Pleistocene extinctions may be forthcoming
suggest that Martin's, Krech's, and White's theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions are all open to question
call attention to the most controversial aspect of all the current theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions
provide support for White's questioning of both Martin's and Krech's positions regarding the role of Paleoindians in the Pleistocene extinctions
此讲解的内容由AI生成,还未经人工审阅,仅供参考。
正确答案是 E。最后一句话提到最近的考古发现支持了 Richard White 对于 Paul Martin 和 Shepard Krech 的 Pleistocene 灭绝观点的质疑,因此选择了 E 选项,即提供对 White 关于 Martin 和 Krech 对 Pleistocene 灭绝角色的质疑的支持。
我选了D, 但是答案是E
我没有选E是因为,我觉得整篇文章谈的是P extinction的原因,而不是human对P extingction的影响?
我错了吗?
call attention to the most controversial aspect 我觉得整篇文章已经是在讨论human是否是引起extinction的因素了,并不需要call attention to了
首先要搞清楚他们中的几个人到底支持什么样的观点:
Martin:灭绝是由人类造成的
krech:人类是灭绝的第二原因,气候也是灭绝的原因
white: martin的论文是依靠人类出现的时间和灭绝的时间一致所以将人类归结为原因,而krech发现了Martin的这个问题,但是没有指出来
最后证据显示人类的到来其实比灭绝要早11000年----灭绝不是人类导致的
登录 或 注册 后可以参加讨论