A,The first presents a circumstance for which the astronomer offers an explanation.
第一个是一个条件,天文学家在解释这个条件。CR:天文学家没有解释why the first,他只是在说在这个前提条件下,可以推断出……。
Some earthquakes, however, take place hundreds of kilometers down in the Earth's mantle, where high pressure makes rock so ductile that it flows instead of cracking,——抓住干抓主干!读多少信息,和你能抓取到多少信息,是两回事。所以读句子时,脑子是处理器,不能处理所有信息,所以要抓主干!!这里如果足够抓主干,就不会错。
震中越深自然peak intensity越low
倒装!!!!!
enjoy certain competitive advantages,具有特定的竞争优势
目的是要减少对对进口fuel的依赖,特别是首句关注的fuel是oil。
现在的情况是在heating上对fuel的需求已经开始从oil转为gas,且gas供给有余;oil的供给也在稳步上升。
关键就在于,对oil的需求会不会增长过快(比如除heating还有其他需要oil的地方)
题中说人类从被感染的虱子上得病,没有说只会从这儿得病
n=8 k=12时 得8/12
我明白C 的意思,但是我就是觉得很牵强啊,所以我选了D ,有人能解释一下为什么D 无关吗?没迁徙记录这不就说明了很可能没狮子吗?以及,没有同行的目击者怎么就削弱了,他这是好几个目击者于不同的时间点目击到的,有没有人同行有什么要紧的?这个削弱也未免太不明显了吧
我也是觉得c是质疑了前提,才没选的,既然前提已经是事实了,为什么要质疑呢,不懂
对啊,C为什么不是质疑前提。。
题干中说的是in the past few years, people 都claim 看到狮子,说明狮子早就在这个地区几年了。但D 说的是in the past year狮子没有迁移过来,完全有可能——自然不能削弱选项。C的话,我的理解是三人成虎,一个人说这是狮子,其他人都这样说。OG 上的说法说,如果两个人一起的话,很可能误认为狮子后,同行者会纠正他。
我觉得不是质疑前提吧,C质疑的 从premise 到conclusion 这一个reasoning 的过程。
P1: several people claim to see a lion
P2: people have no reason to cheat
C: local wildlife managers should begin to address the lion's presence
GAP: Even people have no reason, is there any possible that people have mistakenly believe they have seen a lion when in fact they saw sth else
措施目的 - 环境改变
因果论证 - 其他因素/样本可比性
还有一种算法,m>100,000 ,p>2m(
such:
作代词,指代前面提过的东西或事情,如:
She longed to find somebody who understood her problems, and in him she thought she had found such a person. 她渴望找一个理解她困难的人,她觉得他就是这样一个人。
Accountants were boring. Such was her opinion before meeting Ian! 做会计的个个乏味。在认识伊恩以前她一直这样想。
诸如此类的,如:
We like such fruits as apples and bananas.
起强调作用,如:
It's such a beautiful day!
This issue was of such importance that we could not afford to ignore it.
prefer to
a species of:一种xxx。 例句:a group of animals or plants whose members are similar and can breed together to produce young animals or plants:
Seven species of birds of prey have been observed.
A,They are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
现在他们正在就人类大脑如何发育以及婴儿如何习得语言得出可靠的结论。draw conclusion可以看成是持续的动作,可以用进行时。
run for the presidency,竞选总统,对总统的竞选;
candidacy,竞选资格,竞选事宜;
candidate,竞选人
应该用事对事,物对物,不能物对人。
make一般约束力较强,用to do的形式
请问D选项伴随状语中making的逻辑主语是什么
“ In D, which seems to refer to an event, implying that our ancestors' numbers were reduced FROM an event -- a nonsensical meaning.”
注意:穷人