坑爹啊 数学题一枚。。。画图秒解决
反身代词:
反身代词作代词,表示先行词对自己实施了一个动作,如:After the agreement surfaced, the commission dissolved itself. 委员会解散了自己;或者作先行词的同位语,如:I went to the cinema myself. 或 I myself went to the cinema.
反身代词不能作主语,Wrong:Myself went to the cinema.
B, what the extent would be=程度会变成什么,
focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and to what extent=focused on whether Earth would grow warmer and focused on to what extent earth would grow,这里不再是结构的省略,而是根据语意做的省略
pile up 堆积,可以人堆积也可以物堆积,也可以被动式,如:She piled everything into her suitcase. 她把一应物品装进衣箱。; Work always piles up at the end of the year. 年底总是积压一大堆工作。;The clothes were piled high on the chair. 衣服在椅子上堆得高高的。
increase/slow/decrease/quicken 都用主动式,不用被动式,如:The price/rate/population/number increases. ;We need to increase productivity. 我们需要提高生产力。
be increased式形容词,如:The polymerization shrinkage value decreases when the molecular weight is increased。
B项不能证明良好判断力和决策做得好有因果关系
还是不太能理解E选项的解析,想请问如果我想用e的倒装方法去强调没有标尺的话,这句话要怎么说呢?
because all distances can be measured by no single yardstick.
这里没有衡量标准在because里做状语,但它是导致不能评估宇宙的扩展速度的直接原因,应该做because的主语。
让no single yardstick 做主语,再把句子倒装就可以了。
相同的疑惑...我感觉E逻辑和语法上都没啥错误...
可能把all 改成any就可以了吧
用E的倒装方法去强调没有标尺的话,要改成: It is a notoriously difficult problem to estimate the expansion rate of the universe because no single yardstick can be used to measure all distances. =To estimate the expansion rate of the universe is a notoriously difficult problem because…….
E既不是倒装错了,也不是all错了,它是成分用得不对。no single yardstick 是造成它困难的原因,应该作句子的主要成分(主语或宾语),B把它用作原因状语从句的宾语,E 把它用作原因状语从句的状语,处于从句的第二层,类似于把一个重要的元素藏在一个句子的小角落,不便于说话者达意,也不便于听者/读者理解。
have developed可以省略成as sb have done
E是充分而不必要假设
Yet high rates of straying can be problematic because misdirected fish may interbreed with the existing stock to such a degree that any local adaptations that are present become diluted
high rates-> adaptation diluted
choice c如果取非,salmonid do not benefit from local adaptation, 就削弱了结论
直接细节:The numerical effect is obvious: there are fewer salmon in degraded regions than in pristine ones
直接细节题:Low levels of straying are crucial, since the process provides a source of novel genes and a mechanism by which a location can be repopulates should the fish there disappear.
however, habitat loss also has the potential to reduce genetic diversity
there was a rapid movement是产生similarity的原因,而不是rapid movement是产生similarity的原因
argument指的是ketcham的观点。本文都在讨论K的观点,而非美国政党领袖对于party的意见本身,因此不是theory about early history.
E中There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.,除了rice其他的农作物都没有达到供需平衡。---这句话的意思和我们通常设想的答案(这里的人以rice为主食,其他农作物不能取代它。这个作为这里的assumption很合理)这样的假设有很大的出入。其他农作物没有像目前rice一样达到供需平衡(可能是供大于需,也可能是需大于供),如果是前者还说的通,后者就完全不行了。这种带有可能性的选项排除为好
题目也没看清楚。脑子里想的都是which one must be true...
醉了。。。。
have/gain/lose the capability/ability of doing sth,拥有做某事的能力
B=turtles can endure long fasts, (because turtles) have their ability to survive ,不需要说have their ability,拥有的能力肯定都是自己的能力。
do sth for sb/ sth可以表示目的,如:She works hard for success.=She works hard to achieve success.; do sth for doing sth不能表示目的,只能表示原因或用途
cooperates with governments to improve access VS cooperates with governments for improvements of access选前者,一个是动词和名词的区别:动词表示事情尚未结束,名词表示事情已经确定,句子里与政府合作来提高通道,提高通道这件事尚未发生,动词比名词好;另外,限定符+形容词+名词构成名词词组,其中限定符不能省略。抽象名词/复数名词前不能加a/an,加零冠词,专有名词前不加限定符。improvements作为复数名词,不加a/an,但因为后面跟了of access,表示是通道的提高,而不是其他的提高,前面应该加定冠词the,for the improvements of access