非常tricky的一道题
Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.（SU的基金筹集人成功地从80%的他们所接触的potential donors中得到了捐赠） This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. （结论：这个很高的比率并不能证明这些raiser did a good job）

代词they的指代对象为male emperor penguins，这是没有问题的。但是，they thereby reduce by 25 percent the rate和male emperor penguins huddle over the nests in groups被并列连词and连接。在逻辑上，前者应是后者的结果，即，两者没有并列关系。

还是自己分析句子结构不够快...

C D 纠结 C是表示同时性

①persuming和if表达一样的意思
②一定要注意完成时的正确使用形式

我错选D，因为我认为是把钱分到很多公司里面那么这些公司就持股不到1percent,这样理解其实是逻辑不通的。理解句意很重要，宏观在脑子里知道这句话说什么才能把握正确选项

①用v-ing来修饰之前一整个句子，表示结果最合适不过了
②CD中即使觉得overcome貌似应该用被动 也要仔细动动脑子想一下那个完成时到底合不合适啊！！而且a plan that reduced完全不如a plan to do sth 来得直接干脆啊！！！

as引导的是原因状语从句！！就说看题目的时候半天理解不了...

and more of a kind of fat thought to be 这个是什么成分？and后边的没有谓语动词，所以是和谁并列？

"in particular red wine" doesn't modify anything.
this construction follows alcohol consumption -- in which "alcohol" is an adjective, not a noun -- rather than just alcohol. red wine is not a type of alcohol consumption, so this modifier isn't workable.
the "with..." modifier suggests that wine sales themselves have experienced a reduced risk of heart disease.

反应太慢！！！
依据了几个假设

A强调的是实施政策后成功的可能性？？题目讨论的是农民对于政策的接受程度

理解题太慢了...
①最开始的调查只对developing country中不同的农民进行了分类：who have achieved certain levels of education, wealth, and security of land tenure更愿意接受新科技
②紧接着提出了两种village形式、有土地量的多少、土地占有保证情况对于农民对于科技接受程度的影响，更把接受新科技分为更接受其中的哪一种（更细致）

选对了但是在DE里纠结的时间太长了
就算选E appear也应该是appears

①on condition that x相当于一种虚拟语气
②注意体会 be named 没有被任命 并不是name be used

like只能加名词，如果要改成flight simulator do的话，得把like换成as。我的疑问是help surgeons 不应该是to do sth. 吗，有help sb. do sth. 这种用法吗

做对了但是反应时间太长了。
①allow sb to do sth
②sought是seek的过去式
③choice A has three problems
1)past perfect cannot be justified here
2) look at the split between /they/ and /the two women/ (so here u get a pronoun ambiguity issue）
3）it is grammatically incorrect to end a clause with preposition

类比推理 CQ1

(b) says that rich individuals provide all the funding.
if this is false, then you know that there are other sources of funding, too.
that doesn't destroy the argument, though: even if rich individuals are only one source of donations, a decrement in the $ amount that they donate could still lead to a reduction in services.