非常tricky的一道题
Smithtown University's fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.(SU的基金筹集人成功地从80%的他们所接触的potential donors中得到了捐赠) This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job. (结论:这个很高的比率并不能证明这些raiser did a good job)
代词they的指代对象为male emperor penguins,这是没有问题的。但是,they thereby reduce by 25 percent the rate和male emperor penguins huddle over the nests in groups被并列连词and连接。在逻辑上,前者应是后者的结果,即,两者没有并列关系。
还是自己分析句子结构不够快...
C D 纠结 C是表示同时性
①persuming和if表达一样的意思
②一定要注意完成时的正确使用形式
我错选D,因为我认为是把钱分到很多公司里面那么这些公司就持股不到1percent,这样理解其实是逻辑不通的。理解句意很重要,宏观在脑子里知道这句话说什么才能把握正确选项
①用v-ing来修饰之前一整个句子,表示结果最合适不过了
②CD中即使觉得overcome貌似应该用被动 也要仔细动动脑子想一下那个完成时到底合不合适啊!!而且a plan that reduced完全不如a plan to do sth 来得直接干脆啊!!!
as引导的是原因状语从句!!就说看题目的时候半天理解不了...
and more of a kind of fat thought to be 这个是什么成分?and后边的没有谓语动词,所以是和谁并列?
"in particular red wine" doesn't modify anything.
this construction follows alcohol consumption -- in which "alcohol" is an adjective, not a noun -- rather than just alcohol. red wine is not a type of alcohol consumption, so this modifier isn't workable.
the "with..." modifier suggests that wine sales themselves have experienced a reduced risk of heart disease.
反应太慢!!!
依据了几个假设
A强调的是实施政策后成功的可能性??题目讨论的是农民对于政策的接受程度
理解题太慢了...
①最开始的调查只对developing country中不同的农民进行了分类:who have achieved certain levels of education, wealth, and security of land tenure更愿意接受新科技
②紧接着提出了两种village形式、有土地量的多少、土地占有保证情况对于农民对于科技接受程度的影响,更把接受新科技分为更接受其中的哪一种(更细致)
选对了但是在DE里纠结的时间太长了
就算选E appear也应该是appears
①on condition that x相当于一种虚拟语气
②注意体会 be named 没有被任命 并不是name be used
like只能加名词,如果要改成flight simulator do的话,得把like换成as。我的疑问是help surgeons 不应该是to do sth. 吗,有help sb. do sth. 这种用法吗
有的。 to可以省略
谢谢
做对了但是反应时间太长了。
①allow sb to do sth
②sought是seek的过去式
③choice A has three problems
1)past perfect cannot be justified here
2) look at the split between /they/ and /the two women/ (so here u get a pronoun ambiguity issue)
3)it is grammatically incorrect to end a clause with preposition
类比推理 CQ1
On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base(因为最愿意donate的人是那些以前donate过的人,所以一些raiser会花费很少的力气去扩大donor base). The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.(所以这个高rate表明这些raiser没有很努力的去canvass)