many of the other downtown stores depend on anchor stores' ability to draw shoppers.

此county的货基本上都来自barn，不代表barn的业务/收入都来自此county！！

转：C错在- If you provide support to X, you are giving something to X: I provide support to my mom (I give something to my mom).

转：E的错误在于，主语evidence无法发出classify的动作（可以是researcher拿evidence来classify，但是直接发出不可以）。 借用95楼的解释： to do sth. 表示目的，前提是句子主语是完成目的的逻辑主语. 在这里，句子主语是evidence，但是它并不能发出classify的动作，意味着句子主语不是完成目的的逻辑主语；所以这里的classify遵循support for doing sth.结构.

whenever comparable worth principles are applied to pay schedules, perceived unjustified pay differences are eliminated. In this sense, then, comparable worth is more comprehensive than other mandates. Neither compares tasks in dissimilar jobs (that is, jobs across occupational categories) in an effort to determine whether or not what is necessary to perform these tasks can be quantified in terms of its dollar value to the employer.

转：应该是 support for doing/sth.固定搭配，和provide无关
Next, the idiomatic use of the word "support": in English, we say that one gives/shows support for something. That's natural and idiomatic. To say, "I give my support to something" sounds less natural, more like the kind of mistake someone learning English might make.
Thus, the best answer is (D), singular verb + "for" instead of "to."

毕老师开头说错了吧，idiom应该是provide sth for sb, 或provide sb with sth吧？

B选项简化就成了the city propose projects at a cost..., 不是city以XX为成本/代价，而应该是项目以此为成本/代价

假定k和m代入，如k=7，m=4，原先分别是100:50时。

有信用卡的人看到logo（用现金付账）给小费会更多。
A 没有信用卡的人也会多付-削弱
B 证明logo确实和小费有关
C 没有信用卡-削弱
D 无关比较
E 无关项。没有提小费的情况

上周四：送出的货物里含5个特殊order（没提是否还有其他货）
上周五：只送建材 周六周日停止
TC收到的四个货里有三个是建材=三个是上周五收到的，一个不是上周五收到的
A 剩下的那个不一定是特殊订单。可能是周一周二送的，可能是周四送的其他
B 文中没说周四送的是否包括建材
C 同B文中没说周四送的是否包括建材，周四也有可能送建材
D 同B 建材不一定是周五发的

装雷达的人/吃罚单的人/经常超速的人是三种。
由文章给的条件只能推断出装雷达的人更容易吃罚单（A-B），但是结论是装雷达的人更经常超速（A-C），所以存在gap：吃罚单的人=经常超速的人（B-C）
A 削弱

老师，这题的A选项解释不是很明白，so难道不是一个副词修饰new的吗，AB选项里怎么看出来是so that句型的，又怎么看出来不定式的复合结构是在状语位置的。。

如果把第一个it当做形式主语，则两个it指代不一致 错

Ones指代前面出现过的名词核心词，向后指代会误认为指代离得近的后句中的主语位置

独立主格表伴随，松散的逻辑结构
如果有明确的逻辑关系：因果 转折 让步 条件 平行，最好不用独立主格

If early judicial decisions were prejudiced against patentees, one might expect that subsequent courts would reject the former legal precedents. But pre-1830 cases have been cited as frequently as later decisions

应该选E吧

Never matched in the case ofxxx 结构复杂，不如直接matched byxxx

scholars have questioned whether the American system helped achieve the framers' goals,which are economic growth.

补充
1.fairy tales后用that限定性定从更好
2.最……之一 用among the most 不用some of the most
3.区分 although,even as(at the same time),while