我觉得growing an extra one or two应该是解释overcompensating,不应该是并列关系啊。我觉得选E。
应该是顺承,不算平行。
我觉得,可以把sometimes with the animal overcompensating理解为插入语,这样growing的主语是it,丢掉的胳膊,语义不通。
方式状语和原因状语的区别提到了,但是没展开?
本题中这两种的区别不大,在逻辑上均可以接受。
1, E选项的错误是否还可以通过提取主干的方式判断:Games help to keep by sth. 似乎Games不大适合做sth的使用者。
2,E选项的by proclamation 和D 选项的was proclaimed 是否涉及名词和从句的内涵和外延的考点?
1, 只能说,Games help to keep sth和proclaim这两件事用因果关系更好,而不是方式关系。这和主语是谁没有关系,因为proclamation是名词,名词没有逻辑主语。
2, 是的。
老师,D选项的was proclaimed并没有动词的不定式形态,是怎么判断哪里是内涵和外延的考点的呢?
b选项they指代错误,排
and后应与(can) remember并列,用tend或者tends,c选项排
tend后面是否定,只能与can remember并列,不能与remember并列,主语为单数,a选项排
tend to do,e选项排
错选C。 C表示historian反对结对,而B中的 reservations 是保留意见
B.is committing , committed,这两个个时态完全混乱,排
C.corporations和its不对应, 排
D.an employee和commit不对应,排
E.改变了句意,而且从A可以看出,后面是两个if ... and if ...的并列
a吧 D应该为painstakingly documenting + of
The part of the sentence between the first two commas (“so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform”) is an absolute phrase, an elaboration on the words “so dogged Frances Perkins’ investigation of the garment industry”, placed in apposition.
So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker.
D&E.the last two choices, however, are problematic, because "twice as many trucks" must mean exactly that--i.e., twice as many trucks. as in, 2 乘以(previous # of trucks).
this sentence contains no information about the previous number of trucks; there's only a combined figure for trucks and cars. so, that doesn't work.
A.numbers doesn't make sense. We're talking about a single number, not about more than one number.
B.that number指代469,000,alone表示单独算trucks
C expression " by themselves" conveys the idea that the trucks came off the assembly line automatically by themselves
E:sales of fund shares in July were not as low as what中的 what 去掉是不是也是对的啊
我觉得应该是对的,
个人觉得不行,如果拿掉了what,就变成sales和trade group比了。欢迎讨论!
同问 what可以去掉吗?
what不可以去掉。比较对象是sales 。 what引导名词性从句,意思是以前预测的sales。
是不是应该是they each does somethin呀,还是they each do something
我感觉会不会是 would的原因 they WOULD each DO?
应该是would的原因
曼哈顿写了 应该是They each do
each of sth 采用单数
这题只要知道hearings是听证会的复数形式,分分钟选出来。。。。
难道不是虚拟语气?
选E,手残打错了
这题分析题目如果能看出来这里考的是并列修饰的这个点就好做
首先我们看句子中出现的4个动词regulated、 mandated、required 、 granted,如果根据句意,这句应该想说的是NYC的一个规范自行车的法令,控制速度、要求脚在踏板手握自行车杆、保障行人的通行——显然这个regulate和后面的三个不是在同一层面的,所以regulate应该用定语从句或者现在分词的形式来修饰这个ordinance,所以选D
A. it指代错误,且that用法错误,不能指代前面出现的整个句子
B. a grain-producing state做了competition的同位语,错误;且不必要用过去进行时
C. 找it的先行词,显然不能是P’s farmers,符合单复数形式、能被it指代的是livestock raising,但带入划线部分替换it发现逻辑错误,因此it用法错误;that错误同A
D. It指代错误,同A
E. 正确
选D的同学要注意行文的语气。作者一直在强调新管理style的好处,明显在是有意要推广它。
而如果是contrast的话,作者的态度应该是indifferent的,即不偏不倚,两边都不偏。本文显然不是
E:前后比较的对象是traditional pharmacies和the cornerstone of a successful on-line drugstore,排除E;
B:前后比较的对象是case 和 drugstore,不具有可比性,排除B;
D:as ... so ...的结构使用出错,正确的结构是as A do, so B do。排除D;
A:as it is with…搭配错误,it 无指代,不能指代后面这个句子。排除A。
C:as + be + the case with A, B ... 是新出现的固定搭配。此搭配需学会消化。
针对某一事情意见分歧,即可使用divide on也可使用divide over。